Articles, Blog

Obama, Biden On Gun Control- Full Video Of Press Conference

Before I begin today, let me say to the families
of the innocents who were murdered 33 days ago, our heart goes out to you.  And you
show incredible courage — incredible courage — being here.  And the President and I are
going to do everything in our power to honor the memory of your children and your wives
with the work we take up here today.  
     It’s been 33 days since the nation’s heart was broken by the horrific, senseless
violence that took place at Sandy Hook Elementary School — 20 — 20 beautiful first-graders
gunned down in a place that’s supposed to be their second sanctuary.  Six members of
the staff killed trying to save those children.  It’s literally been hard for the nation
to comprehend, hard for the nation to fathom.  
     And I know for the families who are here that time is not measured in days, but
it’s measured in minutes, in seconds, since you received that news.  Another minute without
your daughter. Another minute without your son.  Another minute without your wife. 
Another minute without your mom.  
     I want to personally thank Chris and Lynn McDonald, who lost their beautiful
daughter, Grace, and the other parents who I had a chance to speak to, for their suggestions
and for — again, just for the courage of all of you to be here today.  I admire the
grace and the resolve that you all are showing.  And I must say I’ve been deeply affected
by your faith, as well.  And the President and I are going to do everything to try to
match the resolve you’ve demonstrated.   
     No one can know for certain if this senseless act could have been prevented, but
we all know we have a moral obligation — a moral obligation — to do everything in our
power to diminish the prospect that something like this could happen again.
       As the President knows, I’ve worked
in this field a long time — in the United States Senate, having chaired a committee
that had jurisdiction over these issues of guns and crime, and having drafted the first
gun violence legislation — the last gun violence legislation, I should say.  And I have no
illusions about what we’re up against or how hard the task is in front of us.  But
I also have never seen the nation’s conscience so shaken by what happened at Sandy Hook. 
The world has changed, and it’s demanding action.
       It’s in this context that the President
asked me to put together, along with Cabinet members, a set of recommendations about how
we should proceed to meet that moral obligation we have.  And toward that end, the Cabinet
members and I sat down with 229 groups — not just individuals, representing groups — 229
groups from law enforcement agencies to public health officials, to gun officials, to gun
advocacy groups, to sportsmen and hunters and religious leaders.  And I’ve spoken
with members of Congress on both sides of the aisle, had extensive conversations with
mayors and governors and county officials.   
And the recommendations we provided to the President on Monday call for executive actions
he could sign, legislation he could call for, and long-term research that should be undertaken.
They’re based on the emerging consensus we heard from all the groups with whom we spoke,
including some of you who are victims of this god-awful occurrence — ways to keep guns
out of the wrong hands, as well as ways to take comprehensive action to prevent violence
in the first place.   
We should do as much as we can, as quickly as we can.  And we cannot let the perfect
be the enemy of the good.  So some of what you will hear from the President will happen
immediately; some will take some time.  But we have begun.  And we are starting here
today and we’re going to resolve to continue this fight.
       During the meetings that we held,
we met with a young man who’s here today — I think Colin Goddard is here.  Where
are you, Colin?  Colin was one of the survivors of the Virginia Tech massacre.  He was in
the classroom.  He calls himself one of the “lucky seven.”  And he’ll tell you
he was shot four times on that day and he has three bullets that are still inside him. 
  And when I asked Colin about what he thought
we should be doing, he said, “I’m not here because of what happened to me. I’m
here because of what happened to me keeps happening to other people and we have to do
something about it.”  
Colin, we will.  Colin, I promise you, we will.  This is our intention.  We must do
what we can now.  And there’s no person who is more committed to acting on this moral
obligation we have than the President of the United States of America.
       Ladies and gentlemen, President Barack
Obama.  (Applause.)  
THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you, everybody.  Please have a seat.  Good afternoon, everybody. 
  Let me begin by thanking our Vice President,
Joe Biden, for your dedication, Joe, to this issue, for bringing so many different voices
to the table.  Because while reducing gun violence is a complicated challenge, protecting
our children from harm shouldn’t be a divisive one. 
  Over the month since the tragedy in Newtown,
we’ve heard from so many, and, obviously, none have affected us more than the families
of those gorgeous children and their teachers and guardians who were lost.  And so we’re
grateful to all of you for taking the time to be here, and recognizing that we honor
their memories in part by doing everything we can to prevent this from happening again.
  But we also heard from some unexpected people. 
In particular, I started getting a lot of letters from kids.  Four of them are here
today — Grant Fritz, Julia Stokes, Hinna Zeejah, and Teja Goode.  They’re pretty
representative of some of the messages that I got.  These are some pretty smart letters
from some pretty smart young people.   
Hinna, a third-grader — you can go ahead and wave, Hinna. That’s you — (laughter.) 
Hinna wrote, “I feel terrible for the parents who lost their children…I love my country
and [I] want everybody to be happy and safe.”  
And then, Grant — go ahead and wave, Grant.  (Laughter.)  Grant said, “I think there
should be some changes.  We should learn from what happened at Sandy Hook…I feel
really bad.”  
And then, Julia said — Julia, where are you?  There you go — “I’m not scared for my
safety, I’m scared for others.  I have four brothers and sisters and I know I would
not be able to bear the thought of losing any of them.”
  These are our kids.  This is what they’re
thinking about.  And so what we should be thinking about is our responsibility to care
for them, and shield them from harm, and give them the tools they need to grow up and do
everything that they’re capable of doing — not just to pursue their own dreams, but
to help build this country.  This is our first task as a society, keeping our children
safe.  This is how we will be judged.  And their voices should compel us to change.
  And that’s why, last month, I asked Joe
to lead an effort, along with members of my Cabinet, to come up with some concrete steps
we can take right now to keep our children safe, to help prevent mass shootings, to reduce
the broader epidemic of gun violence in this country. 
  And we can’t put this off any longer.  Just
last Thursday, as TV networks were covering one of Joe’s meetings on this topic, news
broke of another school shooting, this one in California.  In the month since 20 precious
children and six brave adults were violently taken from us at Sandy Hook Elementary, more
than 900 of our fellow Americans have reportedly died at the end of a gun — 900 in the past
month.  And every day we wait, that number will keep growing.
  So I’m putting forward a specific set of
proposals based on the work of Joe’s task force.  And in the days ahead, I intend to
use whatever weight this office holds to make them a reality. Because while there is no
law or set of laws that can prevent every senseless act of violence completely, no piece
of legislation that will prevent every tragedy, every act of evil, if there is even one thing
we can do to reduce this violence, if there is even one life that can be saved, then we’ve
got an obligation to try.  
And I’m going to do my part.  As soon as I’m finished speaking here, I will sit at
that desk and I will sign a directive giving law enforcement, schools, mental health professionals
and the public health community some of the tools they need to help reduce gun violence.
  We will make it easier to keep guns out of
the hands of criminals by strengthening the background check system.  We will help schools
hire more resource officers if they want them and develop emergency preparedness plans. 
We will make sure mental health professionals know their options for reporting threats of
violence — even as we acknowledge that someone with a mental illness is far more likely to
be a victim of violent crime than the perpetrator.  
  And while year after year, those who oppose
even modest gun safety measures have threatened to defund scientific or medical research into
the causes of gun violence, I will direct the Centers for Disease Control to go ahead
and study the best ways to reduce it — and Congress should fund research into the effects
that violent video games have on young minds.  We don’t benefit from ignorance.  We don’t
benefit from not knowing the science of this epidemic of violence.
  These are a few of the 23 executive actions
that I’m announcing today.  But as important as these steps are, they are in no way a substitute
for action from members of Congress.  To make a real and lasting difference, Congress,
too, must act — and Congress must act soon.  And I’m calling on Congress to pass some
very specific proposals right away.  
First:  It’s time for Congress to require a universal background check for anyone trying
to buy a gun.  (Applause.)   The law already requires licensed gun dealers to run background
checks, and over the last 14 years that’s kept 1.5 million of the wrong people from
getting their hands on a gun.  But it’s hard to enforce that law when as many as 40
percent of all gun purchases are conducted without a background check.  That’s not
safe.  That’s not smart.  It’s not fair to responsible gun buyers or sellers. 
  If you want to buy a gun — whether it’s
from a licensed dealer or a private seller — you should at least have to show you are
not a felon or somebody legally prohibited from buying one.  This is common sense. 
And an overwhelming majority of Americans agree with us on the need for universal background
checks — including more than 70 percent of the National Rifle Association’s members,
according to one survey.  So there’s no reason we can’t do this.
  Second:  Congress should restore a ban on
military-style assault weapons, and a 10-round limit for magazines.  (Applause.) The type
of assault rifle used in Aurora, for example, when paired with high-capacity magazines,
has one purpose — to pump out as many bullets as possible, as quickly as possible; to do
as much damage, using bullets often designed to inflict maximum damage. 
  And that’s what allowed the gunman in Aurora
to shoot 70 people — 70 people — killing 12 in a matter of minutes.  Weapons designed
for the theater of war have no place in a movie theater.  A majority of Americans agree
with us on this.   
And, by the way, so did Ronald Reagan, one of the staunchest defenders of the Second
Amendment, who wrote to Congress in 1994, urging them — this is Ronald Reagan speaking
— urging them to “listen to the American public and to the law enforcement community
and support a ban on the further manufacture of [military-style assault] weapons.” 
And finally, Congress needs to help, rather than hinder, law enforcement as it does its
job.  We should get tougher on people who buy guns with the express purpose of turning
around and selling them to criminals.  And we should severely punish anybody who helps
them do this.  Since Congress hasn’t confirmed a director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco
and Firearms in six years, they should confirm Todd Jones, who will be — who has been Acting,
and I will be nominating for the post.  (Applause.)  
And at a time when budget cuts are forcing many communities to reduce their police force,
we should put more cops back on the job and back on our streets.
  Let me be absolutely clear.  Like most Americans,
I believe the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms. I respect
our strong tradition of gun ownership and the rights of hunters and sportsmen.  There
are millions of responsible, law-abiding gun owners in America who cherish their right
to bear arms for hunting, or sport, or protection, or collection. 
  I also believe most gun owners agree that
we can respect the Second Amendment while keeping an irresponsible, law-breaking few
from inflicting harm on a massive scale.  I believe most of them agree that if America
worked harder to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people, there would be fewer
atrocities like the one that occurred in Newtown.  That’s what these reforms are designed to
do.  They’re common-sense measures.  They have the support of the majority of the American
And yet, that doesn’t mean any of this is going to be easy to enact or implement. 
If it were, we’d already have universal background checks.  The ban on assault weapons
and high-capacity magazines never would have been allowed to expire.  More of our fellow
Americans might still be alive, celebrating birthdays and anniversaries and graduations. 
  This will be difficult.  There will be pundits
and politicians and special interest lobbyists publicly warning of a tyrannical, all-out
assault on liberty — not because that’s true, but because they want to gin up fear
or higher ratings or revenue for themselves.  And behind the scenes, they’ll do everything
they can to block any common-sense reform and make sure nothing changes whatsoever. 
  The only way we will be able to change is
if their audience, their constituents, their membership says this time must be different
— that this time, we must do something to protect our communities and our kids. 
  I will put everything I’ve got into this,
and so will Joe.  But I tell you, the only way we can change is if the American people
demand it.  And by the way, that doesn’t just mean from certain parts of the country. 
We’re going to need voices in those areas, in those congressional districts, where the
tradition of gun ownership is strong to speak up and to say this is important.  It can’t
just be the usual suspects.  We have to examine ourselves and our hearts, and ask ourselves
what is important.   
     This will not happen unless the American people demand it.  If parents and teachers,
police officers and pastors, if hunters and sportsmen, if responsible gun owners, if Americans
of every background stand up and say, enough; we’ve suffered too much pain and care too
much about our children to allow this to continue — then change will come.  That’s what it’s
going to take.  
In the letter that Julia wrote me, she said, “I know that laws have to be passed by Congress,
but I beg you to try very hard.”  (Laughter.)  Julia, I will try very hard.  But she’s
right.  The most important changes we can make depend on congressional action.  They
need to bring these proposals up for a vote, and the American people need to make sure
that they do.   
Get them on record.  Ask your member of Congress if they support universal background checks
to keep guns out of the wrong hands. Ask them if they support renewing a ban on military-style
assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.  And if they say no, ask them why not.  Ask
them what’s more important — doing whatever it takes to get a A grade from the gun lobby
that funds their campaigns, or giving parents some peace of mind when they drop their child
off for first grade?  (Applause.)  
This is the land of the free, and it always will be.  As Americans, we are endowed by
our Creator with certain inalienable rights that no man or government can take away from
us.  But we’ve also long recognized, as our Founders recognized, that with rights come
responsibilities.  Along with our freedom to live our lives as we will comes an obligation
to allow others to do the same.  We don’t live in isolation.  We live in a society,
a government of, and by, and for the people.  We are responsible for each other. 
  The right to worship freely and safely, that
right was denied to Sikhs in Oak Creek, Wisconsin.  The right to assemble peaceably, that right
was denied shoppers in Clackamas, Oregon, and moviegoers in Aurora, Colorado.  That
most fundamental set of rights to life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness — fundamental
rights that were denied to college students at Virginia Tech, and high school students
at Columbine, and elementary school students in Newtown, and kids on street corners in
Chicago on too frequent a basis to tolerate, and all the families who’ve never imagined
that they’d lose a loved one to a bullet — those rights are at stake.  We’re responsible.
  When I visited Newtown last month, I spent
some private time with many of the families who lost their children that day.  And one
was the family of Grace McDonald.  Grace’s parents are here. Grace was seven years old
when she was struck down — just a gorgeous, caring, joyful little girl.  I’m told she
loved pink. She loved the beach.  She dreamed of becoming a painter. 
  And so just before I left, Chris, her father,
gave me one of her paintings, and I hung it in my private study just off the Oval Office. 
And every time I look at that painting, I think about Grace.  And I think about the
life that she lived and the life that lay ahead of her, and most of all, I think about
how, when it comes to protecting the most vulnerable among us, we must act now — for
Grace.  For the 25 other innocent children and devoted educators who had so much left
to give.  For the men and women in big cities and small towns who fall victim to senseless
violence each and every day.  For all the Americans who are counting on us to keep them
safe from harm.  Let’s do the right thing.  Let’s do the right thing for them, and for
this country that we love so much.  (Applause.)   
Thank you.  Let’s sign these orders.  (Applause.)
  All right, there we go.  (Applause.)

69 thoughts on “Obama, Biden On Gun Control- Full Video Of Press Conference

  1. We will all be oppressed by our children. Ask why not take any gun of any fashion so we can protect our selves from corrupt government

  2. Liberty, bullshit. What part of "a well regulated militia" don't you get? The 2nd Amendment was intended to DEFEND the government, not attack it.

    Revolutionary America had a very small military. Regulated militia were used in a support role to defend our communities from attack by Native people and British saboteurs. They were also used for slave patrols in the South, to defend planter elites from their captive labor force.

    If I had my way, you could have all the damn muskets you want.

  3. If you were really good, you might get off three shots a minute with your musket. You can have a damn bayonet too. That's about what our founders had in mind. But I'll go all radical on you. You can have a damn shotgun too. But if I had my way, each shell would be $100, and any other of your precious firearms would be kept in a vault at a gun club. Shells and bullets would be registered, with serial numbers licensed to you. Non compliance would be a damned felony. Kids over guns.

  4. Impeachment is for high crimes and misdemeanors. The Founders approved of a regulated militia, not a free for all. No crime here.

  5. Whoa there. I'm am afraid you are terribly misinformed. The Second Amendment was put in place so that if the government became tyrannical, that the American people could overthrow it by force. So the purpose is two-fold. Protect the citizens and keep tyranny at bay. Do you really think that after the Revolutionary War that the founding fathers wanted the second amendment to protect the "government" rather than it's citizens??? Next time do your research before making an uneducated claim.

  6. By the way, that was a quote from Star Wars. Obviously, I don't think the actual liberty of our country is in danger, but I do fear that little by little, the government is encroaching on our rights. It's not about the guns as much as the control. The biggest problems is that criminals get all their weapons through the black market, and it's way too easy to obtain 30+ round mags. So this only hurts law-abiding gun owners.

  7. Whata criminal… The kids…. How about all the kids you and your administration killed, shipping guns to Mexico. Stop controlling the people. Don't even bring up street corners of Chicago, virtual total gun ban there.. That's why!! Even Newark Mayor Corey Booker says it's mostly illegal guns doing the crimes. Get the guns in the hands of good people rather that restricting law abiding citizens. Of course we know this is all bs and the gov't will stage whatever needed to take more power from us

  8. notice he never mentions how many lives are saved or protected by guns. Im sure some 300 millions people in America compared to his 900 is effective for the low information voter.

  9. Feelgood legislation that focuses on law abiding gun owners who would never do anything like what happened at Sandy Hook. Madmen and criminals don't care what President Obama or VP Biden have to say, none of these regulations will make you 1 percent safer. The answer is INCREASED SECURITY AT SCHOOLS, not restrictions of constitutional rights of law abiding people.

  10. Pass all the gun laws you want in Afghanistan, the terrorists will ignore them and kill our troops anyway. Does the President understand that the answer is SECURITY and not restrictions of rights?

  11. I think its quite funny how Obama has kids that wrote him letters that are for banning guns. Why couldnt he have the little kid who saved his two younger siblings from a burglar with his dads AR-15.

  12. True, but that means we need to limit access to guns overall, in the entire national marketplace, like many other countries did. Once that was accomplished in Australia, Britain, etc., gun violence plummeted drastically.

  13. No, you're misinformed sir. The founders thought their government, custom-built by them to be the best republic ever, was the end-all of history. Check out Washington's response to the Whiskey Rebellion. Google that and read up. Insurrection was NOT on their list of proper duties of citizens. Militia was for protecting the NEW AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC from its enemies: Brits and others seeking to undermine it, and slaves. It IS an educated claim: Ph.D. American history.

  14. Low information voters think guns protect lives. Haven't you seen the video about the reality gun training, where even experienced shooters froze or were incredibly ineffective? And in the several cases where a gun carrier tried to act in a real situation, he was also ineffective with nearly tragic results. Police and military train constantly for that; ordinary citizens–even people comfortable with guns–have a hard time.

  15. Then how have other countries solved the problem so well? Australia, for example, every bit as "wild west" as we were, has instituted strong gun laws and improved the situation there immeasurably.

  16. I understand your claim, but I certainly don't need a Ph.D in American history to understand that banning military firearms will solve nothing. CRIMINALS DO NOT FOLLOW RULES! They receive their weaponry from outside sources, therefore the only people they will be hurting are law abiding-citizens. I also understand the purpose of a WELL REGULATED MILITIA considering my line of work: 74D United States Army. I do agree that this is the best country EVER, but I fear for our rights.

  17. With respect to your service, sir, the fact is that outside sources can be stopped with strict gun laws, just as they have done in the other countries I mentioned. And with limitation of access with sane laws protecting gun rights will work just fine. Arguing otherwise is tantamount to arguing that we should have no laws regulating cars, for example. It's ludicrous.

  18. As NY Times article stated: ". . . places with more guns have more violent deaths, both homicides and suicides. Women and children are more likely to die if there’s a gun in the house. The more guns in an area, the higher the local suicide rates. “Generally, if you live in a civilized society, more guns mean more death,” said David Hemenway, director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center. “There is no evidence that having more guns reduces crime. None at all.”

  19. I think it's safe to say that we'll have to agree to disagree… but that's the great thing about America isn't it!? We don't have to think a certain way. The only answer we must agree on is compromise (something congress has a problem with on both sides). I must say I've enjoyed this little debate. No hard feelings, and it is a pleasure to serve.

  20. Oh and Obama must not be protecting himself and his family with people with guns. Im sure they would be just as effective without their guns.

  21. If we are going to limit the number of bullets people can have in a magazine then we should do the same to the police. If I don't need more then ten rounds to defend myself then they don't.

  22. It's not an entirely different situation at all. You are dealing with deranged people who have no respect for the law, passing more laws will not change anything. Al Capone didn't care what the gun laws were in the 1930's did he? None of this is making you 1 percent safer. Crazy people will still kill you even if you banned every last gun in the world. All you are doing is going after law abiding people who would never do such a thing.

  23. Its amazing how the NRA got slammed for their ad for mentioning Obama's kids. There were statements like "Brining his kids into the matter was an all time low for the NRA" NRA used picture art and here is the president using real life kids. Once again Obama proves he is an elitist hypocrite. Un believable I am so sick of the double standard in our society and the fact that no one is responsible for their own actions in this country anymore. Its always the parents, the tool or their upbringing.

  24. The police have always been limited by law like we were in respect to assault rifles and mag capacity. NY governor is putting an exemption for the police to carry more than the 7 round restriction. People need to realize the country belongs to the people government supposed to be limited not us.

  25. NRA ridiculed for requesting armed guards at every school. Yet that's exactly what most schools are doing. Most cities always had armed police officers and metal detectors at every entrance of the schools. No mass murders in none of those. Now that's common sense to me. Because there will always be a nut job and guns no matter how many laws you put in place. Stopping the threat saves more lives than attempt to reduce it.

  26. Some of the backlash to this is intelligent and some of it is: THEY TOOK OUR GUNS HERP DERP…I think background checks is a form of gun control that people should agree with.

  27. “If there was even one thing we could do to reduce this violence, if there is even one life that can be saved, then we have an obligation to try it. And I’m going to do my part,” Obama said.
    but he an goverment officals continue to let COVICTED MURDERS OUT!!! i hate to bring this subject up but the 2 firemen that lost there life trying to protect the communitty from danger and the sevral others injured and it all could have been prevent just by keeping a murder in prison where he should be

  28. the events that i brought up in the comment bellow is the west webster fire department tragity witch came about by letting some who murderd his grandmother in the 80's he found out his enheritance from his mother had been given to the department when she passed on his release he illegally obtained guns and murderd his sister then lit the house and car to attrack the firedepartment and comitted further a atrosity why didnt the same people that force guncontrol do anything about this

  29. @Barrack Obama Even though that may be some what true, the problem is the news don't ever report on people using them for protection.

  30. Love the part about cracking down on people selling guns to criminals but gun walking is ok like operation fast and furious. Who are the real criminals here?

  31. … More control …. could be. But DON'T TRY TO TOUCH the Second Amendment !!!!!!
    We are Men, not sheeps !!!!!!!!! Citizens have the right to defense themselves.
    This should be worldwide !!!!!!
    Must make life difficult to criminals !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    obama, mainly you are a nasty TRAITOR, ANTIAMERICAN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  32. Don't let our leaders fool you, they don't give a fuck about the lives that were lost and they can care less about anyone else that are not in their sick and twisted click!

  33. Message to Biden and Obama the childen at Sandy Hook died becase they didnt have the same protection that you, the members of your family and Obamas children enjoy. This tragity was your fault. You, Obama, Fienstine, are to blame. and its disgusting how you are using Sandy Hook and the deaths of 20 children to promote your anti- gun, Constitution destroying agenda. You all stink and America is in alot of trouble with you JACKASSES leading the way. May you all rot in hell.

  34. fuck u dude u aint taking my guns… what about baseball bats knifes, guns dont kill people jackass people kill people… so u can stick ur speech up ur ass fucker

  35. Dear President Obama and Joe Biden,
    We are writing to express our deepest, most heart-felt gratitude and appreciation to you for your "economic stimulus package" directed towards our industry. Business is GREAT! Our first quarter profits for 2013 are "through the roof" and we just can't produce our products fast enough to keep up with the overwhelming demand. Our employees and shareholders are so grateful to you for all your hard work – please keep it up!
    The Firearms Industry

  36. Keep tabs everyone, midterm elections are coming close, vote out the asses who voted for this and vote in those who kept their oath for our rights given to us via the US constitution.

  37. Oh yeah? An army infantry man captured nearly 250 Germans with a 5 shot bolt action hunting rifle. It isn't the gun. It's the man behind the gun. Are these elitist hacks that out of touch with reality?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *