100 thoughts on “New Zealand Takes Swift Action On Gun Laws After Massacre | Velshi & Ruhle | MSNBC

  1. Tyranny at it’s finest

    Banning weapons on a statistically isolated incident
    Gun buyback to destroy the guns
    Fining or imprisoning those who don’t comply

    New Zealanders, arm yourselves and form militias. Fight back against this, because it’ll only get worse from here

  2. I think shovel sales will be pretty high this month in New Zealand RIP to the harmless law abiding citizens rifles

  3. Gun control in Palestine is working out well for the Palestinians. The ruling population is able to keep Palestinians in the cage we call Gaza and West Bank with no ability to defend themselves. MSNBC doesn’t care about innocent lives. Just push the agenda from those who pay them their salaries. Pistols account for 99% of gun deaths but they focus on banning rifles because the rifle is what governments fear.

  4. I can't speak on behalf of America but here in New Zealand, we simply don't need guns, especially semi-automatics or rifles.

  5. Should be pointed out it passed with almost universal support too. Only one sitting MP (David Seymour of Act) opposed it. Every other MP of every party supported it.
    Imagine is republicans and democrats ever worked together like that?

  6. We have just watched New Zealanders surrender to the government. It is only a matter of time before people are arrest there for wrong-think like in the UK and Canada.
    Bet IEDs and suicide vests are still legal there. Scum.

  7. Looking on with pain from America. You didn't even try and fight them from taking your guns… 6 days?? New Zealand is lost.
    It will soon be part of New China.


  9. Interesting seeing all the gun nuts criticising New Zealand for making this move. They are calling it 'tyranny', and saying 'crime will spike', 'people won't be safe in their homes' etc.

    Some facts for you.

    New Zealand outranks the USA in EVERY freedom index. Tyranny isn't a concern for them.
    No nation has the capability to invade them across the ocean. They aren't scared of China.
    NZ has literally less than a fifth the US homicide rate. What was that about guns being good for 'protection'?

    Ardern is a democratically elected leader, and has massive support in government and from the population for this move. The dinosaurs saying things like "WOMEN DO NOT BELIEVE IN FREEDOM" are especially amusing. The 50's called, they miss you.

  10. They are deciding which guns to ban based on military "style". That means they aren't banning the gun based on it functioning like a military grade weapon but rather on cosmetics that make it "look" like a military weapon. That's ignorant.
    I hope they never realize that many hunting rifles are more powerful, more accurate and have a longer range than many of the military "style" guns that they are trying to ban.
    They would think my mini14 rifle that looks like and is a hunting rifle is ok. In reality my mini14 uses the same ammo as the AR15 and can fire just as fast as I can pull the trigger.
    I actually prefer my mini over an AR15 not because it's better than an AR15 (it's not) but because it doesn't look like a menacing scary black gun. If someone saw me carrying it they would think I'm going deer hunting and not going to a school massacre. And that's the way I like it. Nothing to see here folks. It's just a harmless deer rifle. Move along people.

  11. I think if you have a National Pedophile Association and a good lobby in Washington than pedophile will be hard to erase

  12. You either want guns or you don’t the gun is only as deadly as the user the gun is not a living thing to officially ban guns you need to ban the knowledge of how there made which is impossible look at the situation of PA lutty he built a gun in his garage by hand making every thing from the magazine the barrel to the receiver.

  13. I'm sooo glad the government knows what is best for me and is sooo willing to protect me from myself.
    According to the Lexicon of firearms terminology and the U.S. Military the definition of an "Assault Rifle" is a shoulder fired, magazine fed, long gun chambered for an intermediate powered cartridge capable of selective fire.

  14. “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjugated races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subjugated races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police.” -Adolf Hitler.

    This is Tyranny 101 New Zealanders. Take note. Rebel. Don’t let them take your guns. If they come for you, fight back. Organize yourselves.

  15. Commie taxinda ardern should just shut her filthy mouth she has no idea what she's doing and shouldn't even be prime minister…we need America to invade nz and free us from this dictatorship and make us the 52nd state of the USA so we can have a right to self defence as well as have your second amendment right to bear arms…I could just go the American embassy and claim asylum from this nasty little dictator she wants us defences and will turn us into crimals if we make a stand

  16. Correct me if I’m wrong but does not any gun take on the nature of the person who has it , I want a gun to protect me & my family

  17. Lol well here’s a fun fact. About 2.5 times more people die of hospital acquired infections (~80,000) per year in the USA. Don’t hear the dems trying to ban hospitals 😉

  18. Loving the comments from Americans, you lot have literally shown the world that those 100 deaths per day mean absolutely nothing. What a joke of a country.

  19. Here's my take: guns should be legal, but people should need to have a gun license which would entail gun operation and safety training. Just show the guy at the gun store your gun i.d. and bingo bongo easy as that buy whatever you want.

  20. The problem with the NRA gun mental nut jobs is their lack of justification in keeping guns, they have zero argument or defense when it comes to mass shootings or murders that involve machine guns or any guns, it's all about protecting their redneck culture,their power and their money and everyone else is expandable.

  21. LYING MORONS ..MILITARY WEAPONS ARE ALL CAPABLE OF AUTOMATIC FIRE ..AND ARE HEAVILY CONTROLLED IN THE U.S. ..no military in the world uses civilian single shot per trigger pull .. clones of military weapons … automatic weapons in the us are highly regulated. A special license from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) is required to manufacture, sell, and own any of these the person must obtain an additional license on top of the FFL. These dealers are referred to as FFL/SOT (special occupational tax) or Class 3 FFL dealers. It is a lengthy and burdensome process that requires extensive investigation by ATF… you would be required to submit fingerprints and a photo to accompany your background check. Each NFA item also requires its own tax stamp, which costs $200. Once the ATF decides that an individual is permitted by law to own a NFA item, it adds that individual’s name, address, and biographical information to a federal gun registry and matches it to the serial number of the licensed NFA item. This goes for every item listed in the NFA, not just automatic weapons . Individuals with NFA items are then required to notify the ATF when they move and any time they plan to travel outside their state of residence with the NFA item

  22. While the nation argues about how best to respond to the proliferation of mass shootings, researchers have found that one way to limit mass killings would be to identify those at greatest risk of committing these types of crimes.

  23. There were also 27% more casualties from 2009 to 2015 per mass shooting incident in the European Union than in the U.S.

  24. Will New Zealand also disarm ISIS which has vowed revenge, if yes, how. Their intelligence couldn't stop the Mosque attack.

  25. The whole globe believes in Banning meth yet they still have it if we ban guns the bad guys will still have them

  26. Stunning…..that MSNBC is doing a story not related to Russiagate.
    As for New Zealand, they did what THEY thought was correct. It’s their government, not ours. They did in a week what we can’t do in years. Even after school children get slaughtered. We just call that “Tuesday” here in America.
    Good for NZ.

  27. Here's an idea…how about our news stations run the names and hometowns of every person killed by a firearm on the day it's officially made public? Every day, we would see the names of our lost citizens, and know how terrible our gun policies are, as the evidence scrolls on the screen. Every day, new names. It will galvanise the opposition of our deadly archaic adherence to the 2nd Amendment. As a child, I saw the names of every local soldier killed in Vietnam during the nightly news. It scared me enough to become a lifetime pacifist.
    Run their names. Every day.

  28. more people are killed by semi auto pistols on the streets of Chicago and every other big blue city on a daily basis than were killed in n.z. yet where is the call for these blue cities to stop their gun violence, which mostly involves illegal weapons? no, for some strange reason these 'experts' always wrongly define this weapon as an assault weapon and want long guns banned. people using long guns are responsible for only a very small percentage of gun deaths every year. mass shooting account for only a very small fraction of u.s. gun deaths. yet we see the regressives constantly bemoan these deaths and immediately start in wanting gun bans. this logic doesn't add up. their agenda is not gun violence, or they would be concentrating on the big blue cities. they want our long guns so patriots won't be able to defend themselves when the left's agenda comes to fruition.

  29. The Federalist, No. 46, where the Father of the Constitution himself, James Madison, addresses the role of the state governments as counterbalances to the federal government. As a last resort, he contemplates the prospect of a tyrannical federal government using the army to impose its will on the states.

    Let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the state governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger. The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms, will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it. Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.

    The point of The Federalist No. 46 was not to game out the details of this kind of conflict between a federal army and state militias allied with an armed citizenry. Madison’s point was to demonstrate how the whole constitutional system was designed to prevent such a conflict. The point was to set up a system where a revolution would never be needed in the first place, by ensuring that there is as little distance as possible between the coercive power of government and the people it governs. An armed citizenry and state militias, along with a military of citizen soldiers, are all part of that system.

    This system is built to prevent tyranny, but it cannot prevent all conflict. It certainly did not keep Americans from shooting each other over slavery. Notice in that case, though, that the regular army was as divided as the rest of the country, to the point where top Union officers—including Gen. Robert E. Lee, who was originally offered the Union command—defected to the Confederate cause. If the purpose of the division and dispersal of coercive power is to ensure there is no separation between the military and the people, that doesn’t help when the people themselves are truly divided.

    Despite the overdramatization among the chattering classes, we are fortunately very far from reaching that breaking point today. We should not tempt fate, though, by blithely dismissing or tearing down any part of the system that keeps us from getting there by shortening the distance between the government and the governed.

  30. Coming soon to New Zealand: Rampant knife crime, acid attacks and trucks of peace.

    But don't worry, I know how to stop it all. All you have to do is make MURDER illegal, then people will stop doing it. Because everyone always does what the law says.

  31. That's a true government and real prime minister changed the law immediately to protect people.
    American they go to war with their own country to change the law.
    Wow! That's shows they're still scared of china.

  32. Best thing John Howard did in Australia is changing the gun laws.
    American excuse right to bare arm from who!
    You don't need a machine gun to protect yourself.
    Unless they're still scared of china

  33. The changes in the U.S. homicide rate over time are interesting. In 1900 there were few gun laws. New York had no handgun law and California no waiting period. Guns of all types could be ordered by mail or bought anonymously. And the homicide rate was 1.2, about one-sixth of what it is today. The homicide rate peaked in 1933, during the Depression, and then fell. It was low during and after World War II, but began to rise in the 1960s and 1970s, and reached its high for this century, 10.7, in 1980. It then fell to 8.3 in 1985, a fall of 22 percent. This welcome news was virtually ignored by the media, which emphasize rises in violence but downplay decreases. Homicide rose again in the late 1980s, but not to its 1980 high. The homicide rate continued to rise following the Gun Control Act of 1968, while the fall in the early 1980s occurred when anti-crime laws but no new anti-gun laws were passed.

    From 1991 to 1997 the U.S. homicide rate fell 30 percent. Liberals credit a strong economy and low unemployment; conservatives point to three-strikes laws and increasing use of the death penalty. We are uncertain which factors to credit. The portion of the population made up by males aged 15 to 24, the most crime-prone group, fell by 5 percent, so this can account for only a fraction of the 30 percent fall in homicide. In any case, the fall began in 1992, while the Brady Act (waiting period for handgun buyers) and the assault-weapons ban went into effect in 1994. Clearly, these laws cannot be credited for a fall in homicide that had begun two years earlier. Violence is often like an Rorschach test — what we read into it depends more on us than on it. This subjectivity must be avoided.

    Will extremely harsh anti-gun and anti-crime laws be more effective than conventional laws? Figures for East and West Germany, the last before the Wall came down, reveal a unique "experiment." In 1945 a uniform population was split in two. After four decades of dictatorial rule, the homicide rate in the Communist East was 0.7, hardly lower than that in the free West, 1.0. But the suicide rate in the East was 25.8, much higher than 15.8 in the West. That is, even the harshest regime prevented few homicides, but at the cost of many suicides — hardly a fair exchange. Overly severe laws may be counterproductive as well as oppressiveIsrael and Switzerland, where most adult males keep military-type guns at home, have low homicide rates, so easy access to guns cannot be the key factor in homicide. Some nations with strict anti-gun laws also have low homicide rates, but is this cause and effect? The low homicide rate in the United Kingdom holds for both gun and non-gun homicides; strict gun laws cannot account for a low rate of fatal beatings. Japan has harsh anti-gun and anti-crime laws and a low homicide rate, but Japanese-Americans, who live under our laws and have access to guns, also have a low homicide rate. Japanese immigrants bring something with them that inhibits homicide and is transmitted to their children and grandchildren. It may be self-control or love of education, but it has nothing to do with laws. Cultural factors are clearly important. To study the effect of gun laws, statisticians would first have to correct for all the cultural differences between various nations. Not enough is known to do this. The best we can do is observing what happens when new gun laws are passed in the U.S. and Germany, or when Japanese live in the U.S. In these cases, little effect of gun laws is seen.

    In telling Americans, especially young ones, that they live in the most violent nation on earth, we are slandering our country. In addition, we may be inadvertently increasing the violence. Studies reveal that children whose teachers believe they will do well actually do better in school. Children may sense their teachers' expectations and live up to them. It seems likely that children raised to believe that they come from the most violent people on earth will act accordingly. The violence-prone minority will be more violent, believing that they must strike before others attack them, while the nonviolent majority will lapse into hopeless passivity. This is not helpful to a free country.

    It really comes down to what we prefer as a basis for our opinions — facts or myths. Myths may be comforting, but they rarely lead to effective action. Myths tell us that nations with strict anti-gun laws have low rates of suicide and homicide, so the answer is easy — pass more laws. And if the laws don't work, pass still more. Facts, on the other hand, may be disturbing. They rarely provide easy answers for complex problems.

    Without the deceptive comfort of myths, we are forced to confront reality. Liberals must face the fact that despite billions spent on social programs, changes to make the justice system more "fair," and new gun-control laws, the homicide rate doubled since the 1960s. Conservatives must face the fact that despite continuing family breakup, fatherless boys, decaying schools, and loss of respect for human life, the homicide rate fell by one-third in the 1990s. Advocates of drug legalization must face the fact that this fall in homicide occurred as the "war" on drugs continued. Opponents of violent films and video games must face the fact that as these increased, homicide as well as school violence fell, despite highly publicized shootings. Conversely, liberals must admit that the recent fall in homicide was associated with three-strikes laws and increasing use of the death penalty, while conservatives must admit that the fall in homicide was associated with low unemployment and a strong economy.

    In short, we all must admit that we have much to learn about the causes of violence. This requires more effort and intellectual honesty than looking to the government to pass yet another law. America is hardly the most violent nation, and our homicide rate has fallen recently, but we are more violent than we used to be — and than we should be.

  34. want innovative change? invite john pedesta, and he will rock your world like a real casino, you might win, but you will lose

  35. FALSE FLAG ATTACK to take Guns and turn NZ over to the UN The Islamization of your Country is to Destroy your CULTURE

  36. Instead of banning gun she should ban Muslim immigrants. NZ PM has no astute
    did not analysis situation.

  37. By the governments criteria of mass shooting, any shooting in which has 4 or more deaths, only 28 mass shootings happend in 2018. Many of those 340 "mass shootings" didnt have a death.

  38. She is brainless, the only military feature is the pistol grip. Really quick to make a new law, or was it ready and waiting, never let a masacre go to waste.

  39. Having read through most of the comments below I really am surprised at how ignorant some Americans are about the rest of the world. In NZ only 5% of the population own guns and the other 95% don't want or need them. Yes you have your 2nd Amendment and it is way out of date but you will NEVER change and NZ will NEVER be like the US. We speak the same language but that is where the similarities end

  40. The root problem is the American Political system that encourages Self-interests and Corruption on a massive scale. This situation makes it hard to get sensible things done like gun control or having affordable healthcare and tertiary education plus having a sizable population that's highly resistant to change which ironically could benefit them didn't help either. So they're stuck, jammed, frozen in the same mess that could have been sorted out pretty quickly because they keep shooting themselves in the foot or in America's case, their brains.

  41. Look up
    "Kent Hovind on Gun Control" makes the mainstream media look foolish,
    definitely an eye opener!!!

  42. European here, our guns are gone, crime and terrorism is on unpreceeded levels and rising. Americans, defend your gun rights!!!

  43. Better if new zealand take better swift actions on islam and take responsibility of their own people who r facing danger because of islam

  44. I think the goverment should tell us how to do everything. They are alot smarter than us and do alot of that thinking stuff. You know the stuff we are too busy to do.

  45. UK tried this; And the majority is still paying the bill, those in Whitehall won't admit they made a mistake, and those who gave up their rights for security regret it now, You disarm the public, it's like opening the sheep's pasture gate and ringing the dinner bell for the wolves.

    I'm not with the NRA or any group, if NZ wishes for this law, alright then. All I ask is take time to think about it. Giving up a right and a freedom for security is easy; but if it is requested to be returned, getting it back is impossible.

    Once you forfeit a freedom you give up the right to choose, not just for ourselves but for future generations.

    That coward who murdered those innocents, can sit back knowing his actions have made an impact in that peaceful country, made people more afraid. I'm not familiar with NZ firearm laws, I don't know how this hater could have required a licence with his radical beliefs being known.

    How did he slip through the net?It's no skin off my back

  46. what results do EXTREME GUN RESTRICTIONS have ?..ask the BBC

    Gun crime offences in London surged by 42% in the last year, according to official statistics.

    The Met Police's figures showed there were 2,544 gun crime offences from April 2016 to April 2017 compared to 1,793 offences from 2015 until 2016.


    Knife and gun crime rockets across England and Wales

    The use and movement of illicit firearms by criminals is a serious national problem. It

    impacts every Australian jurisdiction and affects the safety of our community.

    Criminals continue to acquire and use firearms to enable their criminal business, whether

    it is to protect their interests, intimidate or to commit acts of violence. Technological

    advancements have seen individuals and organised crime increasingly able to purchase

    illegal firearms and components anonymously facilitated through the use of darknets,

    encrypted communications and digital currencies. Illegal virtual marketplaces have made

    firearms more widely available and increasingly allow anonymous procurement of firearms

    by criminal entities.

  47. https://www.acic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2016/10/illicit_firearms_in_australia_0.pdf?v=1477016769
    The use and movement of illicit firearms by criminals is a serious national problem. It
    impacts every Australian jurisdiction and affects the safety of our community.
    Criminals continue to acquire and use firearms to enable their criminal business, whether
    it is to protect their interests, intimidate or to commit acts of violence. Technological
    advancements have seen individuals and organised crime increasingly able to purchase
    illegal firearms and components anonymously facilitated through the use of darknets,
    encrypted communications and digital currencies. Illegal virtual marketplaces have made
    firearms more widely available and increasingly allow anonymous procurement of firearms
    by criminal entities.

  48. Never surrender your liberty EVER!!!! Stop being sheep! A AR15 is not a assault rifle repeat a lie enough it becomes truth 37 sheep turned in out of 1.2 million these stats this clown is spewing are lies!

  49. Well,the new zealnders are not protected by their constitution.Neither the Australians.These countries are not constitutional republics.They never had a document which says ,it is your God Given Right to own a gun.Therfore they don’t protect their rights ,the government says we do this,the public bends over and takes it.I live in in Australia,it’s the same here.One person do something bad,everybody gets punished for it.And as a result they take away the liberties of the public but by bit by bit,in your safety of course.Americans,hang onto your guns and freedom.Everybody talks about guns,but nobody raised a question,that why Muslims were worshiping Allah in a western small town in New Zealand called Christchurch?…Maybe If you want to worship Allah,go to Islamabad .Very Simple

  50. Furthermore, 80 plus percent of gun RELATED deaths are with pistols. So when NZ bans so called assault weapons people will just use what they have. Pistols will be next then like the U.K. they will ban knives and then they will ban screwdrivers and then ban the motion that looks like you might be sharpening an object that can be used to impale someone with.

  51. Too bad, stabbing has risen to a higher value than gun-violence ever rose. Went from 62 percent to 91 percent. How disappointing! Owning a gun will stop those shootings more than it would cause them. Just like Kaitlin Bennett once said, “the media wants you to believe it’s 311 (mass shootings), it’s actually only 10.” Only if statistics were accurate, and unbiased.

  52. ALL MASS SHOOTINGS HAPPEN IN “GUN FREE ZONES” think about it before you give up your guns America, there are many reasons why you have the 2nd amendment not just to bear arms….

  53. Australia got rid of a lot of semi autos and we still have had mass shootings, you can implement all the laws you like but your never going to stop mass murders….stop looking at what the perpetrator is using, we had a mother who killed members of her family with a kitchen knife, but we are not making stricter laws with knives…firearms are not overly effective when it comes to “body count” using bombs and cars will increase body counts more than a rifle will….getting rid of guns will not work….PERIOD!!

  54. 40 seconds on New Zealand's news VS 5 minutes 50 seconds on US bashing. (while titling "New Zealand Takes Swift Action on Gun Laws". MSNBC Good job taking a tragedy in New Zealand to push an agenda to strip Americans of their constitutional rights here in the United States. Maybe spend more time actually covering the NEWS instead of telling people how to think with you political agenda pushing news anchors and guest speakers.

  55. Ever think that bad guys are doing it to get guns band or to try to have an upper hand? Think out of the box and don't drink the Cool-Aid peeps.

  56. New Zealand DID NOT CHANGE IT'S LAW…..A corrupt Gov forced guns to be destroyed !!!!

    And it was the USA Democrats who forced a bad law called THE GUN FREE SCHOOL ZONES ACT which still communicates to all psycho shooters that all children's schools are DISARMED easy access target rich killing fields. And the psycho killers are enabled by the Democrats who forced the bad law which has resulted in many mass shootings. When any politicians lies and tries to say that a semi-auto AR 15 is a military weapon, the that politician is tyrannical.

    The AR 15 is NOT a military weapon because it is semi auto in the USA !!!!

    Tyranny can present itself in many forms. A government that forces it's borders open in order to buy votes from a dangerous enslaving, murdering, common out-breeder cult ISLAM…

    is lead by tyrannical Politicians…..Democrats !

    Remove all Democrat Politicians in 2020.

    A Quote by Marcus Tullius Cicero – Addressing the Roman Senate in the year (43 B.C)

    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.

    An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.

    But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys,

    heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor;

    he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments,

    he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation,

    he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city,

    he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear."

  57. Democrat politicians want to retire in a nice big peaceful home…..without a MS-13 or another Mexican Drug Cartel killer coming to hunt down patriot democrats.

    So these Democrat Politicians have decided to not become patriots, and rather, they are securing their own lucrative retirement by buying Mexican votes which as you can see, has secured a Democrat control (a coup) of California, and soon the Texas and Arizona Gov's by forcing our Mexican borders open which insures that Democrats will get the Mexican vote and remain in office until a lucrative retirement occurs, with lots of bribe money from corrupt corporations along the way – corrupt corporations which benefited by cheap Mexican labor !

    California will never see another non-Mexican Mayor of Los Angeles….because the Mexican/Democrat coup in California was a success. The Mexicans now control the California Gov.

    And they have taken over the Construction Businesses throughout California by hiring cheap illegal Mexican labor !!!!

    In 2020 please vote for Republican Politicians….preferably with a military background, enabling him to protect his own family and his country from tyranny and illegal invaders from Mexico and the middle east.

    Although Trump has delayed the goal of all the treasonous Democrats who want to burn our US Constitution by forcing our borders open to dangerous Islam and Mexicans….. The Democrats have announced their tyrannical goal to disarm the good citizens of the USA…..which will lead to high taxes and enslavement.

    Below is some critical voting History that you can act on by voting in 2020 !!!!

    This list shows that DEMOCRAT SENATORS voted
    to not keep your 2nd Amendment.

    Purpose…..To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United
    States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.

    Vote Counts:
    YEAs 53
    NAYs 46

    Alexander (R-TN), Yea
    Ayotte (R-NH), Yea
    Baldwin (D-WI), Nay
    Barrasso (R-WY), Yea
    Baucus (D-MT), Nay
    Begich (D-AK), Yea
    Bennet (D-CO), Nay
    Blumenthal (D-CT), Nay
    Blunt (R-MO), Yea
    Boozman (R-AR), Yea
    Boxer (D-CA), Nay
    Brown (D-OH), Nay
    Burr (R-NC), Yea
    Cantwell (D-WA), Nay
    Cardin (D-MD), Nay
    Carper (D-DE), Nay
    Casey (D-PA), Nay
    Chambliss (R-GA), Yea
    Coats (R-IN), Yea
    Coburn (R-OK), Yea
    Cochran (R-MS), Yea
    Collins (R-ME), Yea
    Coons (D-DE), Nay
    Corker (R-TN), Yea
    Cornyn (R-TX), Yea
    Cowan (D-MA), Nay
    Crapo (R-ID), Yea
    Cruz (R-TX), Yea
    Donnelly (D-IN), Yea
    Durbin (D-IL), Nay
    Enzi (R-WY), Yea
    Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
    Fischer (R-NE), Yea
    Flake (R-AZ), Yea
    Franken (D-MN), Nay
    Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay
    Graham (R-SC), Yea
    Grassley (R-IA), Yea
    Hagan (D-NC), Yea
    Harkin (D-IA), Nay
    Hatch (R-UT), Yea
    Heinrich (D-NM), Yea
    Heitkamp (D-ND), Yea
    Heller (R-NV), Yea
    Hirono (D-HI), Nay
    Hoeven (R-ND), Yea
    Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
    Isakson (R-GA), Yea
    Johanns (R-NE), Yea
    Johnson (D-SD), Nay
    Johnson (R-WI), Yea
    Kaine (D-VA), Nay
    King (I-ME), Nay
    Kirk (R-IL), Yea
    Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay
    Landrieu (D-LA), Nay
    Lautenberg (D-NJ), Not Voting
    Leahy (D-VT), Nay
    Lee (R-UT), Yea
    Levin (D-MI), Nay
    Manchin (D-WV), Yea
    McCain (R-AZ), Yea
    McCaskill (D-MO), Nay
    McConnell (R-KY), Yea
    Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
    Merkley (D-OR), Nay
    Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
    Moran (R-KS), Yea
    Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
    Murphy (D-CT), Nay
    Murray (D-WA), Nay
    Nelson (D-FL), Nay
    Paul (R-KY), Yea
    Portman (R-OH), Yea
    Pryor (D-AR), Yea
    Reed (D-RI), Nay
    Reid (D-NV), Nay
    Risch (R-ID), Yea
    Roberts (R-KS), Yea
    Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
    Rubio (R-FL), Yea
    Sanders (I-VT), Nay
    Schatz (D-HI), Nay
    Schumer (D-NY), Nay
    Scott (R-SC), Yea
    Sessions (R-AL), Yea
    Shaheen (D-NH), Nay
    Shelby (R-AL), Yea
    Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
    Tester (D-MT), Yea
    Thune (R-SD), Yea
    Toomey (R-PA), Yea
    Udall (D-CO), Nay
    Udall (D-NM), Nay
    Vitter (R-LA), Yea
    Warner (D-VA), Nay
    Warren (D-MA), Nay
    Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay
    Wicker (R-MS), Yea
    Wyden (D-OR), Nay

    Once our 2nd Amendment is disrespected and gone. The taxes will be raised to take our wealth for the Greedy Gov colluding FEP (Financially Elite Psychopaths).


    A Quote by Marcus Tullius Cicero – Addressing the Roman Senate in the year (43 B.C)

    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.
    An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.
    But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys,
    heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor;
    he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments,
    he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation,
    he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city,
    he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear."

  58. They need to ban Islamic critique next Allah Hu Akbar
    New Zealanders need let muslim men have a night of passion with their wives to show their approval of diversity.

  59. An assault rifle means a rifle which can switch between semi-automatic and full-automatic fire modes, and is used very little in the actual purchase of a firearm

  60. Yeah…but this is just BAD. It's stupid. Poor New Zealanders….You are being had big time. Go ahead and hand over your liberties, your rights… You'll regret this…you'll regret this slippery slope your leaping onto. It's nonsensical and it's the wrong reaction…as in NOT a solution at all. Woe unto New Zealand.

  61. I wish New Zealand luck should a hostile foreign county like China sees that your country has a defenseless population and decides to launch a full-scale invasion on New Zealand. 🙂

  62. An assault rifle has to have select fire by definition. Notice he said assault "style" rifle. If you don't like firearms that's your business, but at least know the facts first.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *