Articles, Blog

Hillary Clinton’s Plan To Reduce Gun Violence


HILLARY CLINTON CONTINUES TO
PUSH AGGRESSIVELY FOR MORE GUN CONTROL. SHE IS MAKING PROMISES THAT IF
SHE IS ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES SHE WOULD TAKE
CERTAIN EXECUTIVE ACTION TO ENSURE THAT GUN REGULATION
BECOMES LAW IN THE U.S.. TO GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE, SHE
WOULD LIKE UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND CHECKS, ROLLING BACK
LEGAL IMMUNITY FOR THE GUN INDUSTRY ñ MEANING THAT IF SOMETHING GOES
WRONG WITH A GUN, THAT GUN MANUFACTURER IS NO LONGER GOING
TO BE ñ AND ALSO LEGISLATION TO KEEP FIREARMS OUT OF THE
HANDS OF DOMESTIC ABUSERS. UNDER CLINTON’S PLAN, BACKGROUND
CHECKS WOULD BE EXPANDED TO CLOSE LOOPHOLES FOR PRIVATE
SALES AT GUN SHOWS AND ONLINE. IF ELECTED PRESIDENT, SHE WOULD
USE EXECUTIVE ACTION TO DEEM ANY INDIVIDUAL SELLING A
SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF FIREARMS IN THE BUSINESS IN
ORDER TO HOLD PRIVATE SELLERS TO THE SAME
RULES AS GUN RETAILERS. ANOTHER THING SHE IS PLANNING ON
DOING IS THAT SHE WANTS TO CLOSE LOOPHOLES WHEN IT COMES TO
CERTAIN BACKGROUND CHECKS. ONE OF THEM WAS TAKEN ADVANTAGE
OF BY THE OREGON SHOOTER. SHE ALSO PROPOSES CLOSING THE
SO-CALLED CHARLESTON LOOPHOLE, A REFERENCE TO THE
SHOOTING IN JUNE, AT A HISTORICALLY BLACK CHURCH IN
CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA, IN WHICH THE PERSON WAS ABLE
TO PURCHASE A GUN DESPITE HAVING A CRIMINAL RECORD
BECAUSE OF A BACKGROUND CHECK. IF IT TAKES LONGER THAN 72
HOURS, A GUN DEALER CAN JUST SELL THE WEAPON WITHOUT
THE COMPLETED CHECK. LET ME GIVE YOU AN
EXAMPLE OF THE SECOND POINT. THERE WAS A FAMILY WHOSE
DAUGHTER WAS KILLED IN THE COLORADO SHOOTINGS, THEY SUED THE
PEOPLE WHO SOLD THE WEAPON. THEY SAID THEY SHOULD’VE DONE A
BETTER BACKGROUND CHECK ON THE GUY. JAMES HOLMES WAS CLEARLY
MENTALLY ILL, AND YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE SOLD
HIM A WEAPON. SOME OF THE BULLETS WERE SO
POWERFUL, THEY WENT THROUGH MOVIE THEATER SEATS. WHAT HAPPENED WAS THEY SUED,
THEY LOST BECAUSE THE GUN MANUFACTURERS HAVE IMMUNITY. THEN THEY SAID BECAUSE OF
COLORADO’S LAWS, WHICH BY THE WAY ARE SUPER DISPUTABLE,
ALL THE GUN RIGHTS ADVOCATES CAME IN WITH CRUSHING
RESOURCES AGAINST THEM. THEY SAID SINCE YOU LOST YOU
HAVE TO PAY THEIR ATTORNEYS. NOW THEY OWE $200,000 TO THE PEOPLE WHO SOLD THE GUNS
WHO KILLED THEIR DAUGHTER. HILLARY CLINTON SAYS NO, WE’RE
NOT GOING TO DO THAT. EVEN IF YOU DON’T HAVE IMMUNITY,
YOU MIGHT STILL WIN IN COURT. THIS JUST MEANS YOU SHOULD BE
ABLE TO GO TO COURT AND CONTEST THIS CASE. WE GET SO OUTRAGED AT DIPLOMATIC
IMMUNITY, BUT THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT HAVE IMMUNITY ARE GUN
MANUFACTURERS IN THIS COUNTRY. I
LIKE THAT CLINTON HAS TAKEN
THIS ISSUE AND IS PUSHING FOR IT AGGRESSIVELY. I THINK SHE IS BEING SINCERE
AND IT IS A GREAT THING. BUT THERE’S ALSO A HUGE
POLITICAL COMPONENT TO THIS. ONE OF HER COMPETITORS
IS BERNIE SANDERS. THERE IS ONE ISSUE WHERE
BERNIE SANDERS IS A LITTLE SKETCHY, AND THAT IS
GUN CONTROL. DECADES AGO HE VOTED AGAINST
LEGISLATION THAT WOULD GIVE BACK LEGAL IMMUNITY FOR
GUN MANUFACTURERS. PEOPLE HAVE BEEN CRITICIZING HIM
A BIT FOR THAT. I THINK HILLARY CLINTON HAS
GRASPED THIS ISSUE AS HER WAY OF DIFFERENTIATING HERSELF
BETWEEN BERNIE SANDERS. BERNIE SANDERS SAYS I WAS
REPRESENTING VERMONT WHICH IS PRO-GUN. SINCE THEN, AFTER THE NEWTOWN
MASSACRE, HE FLIPPED A COUPLE OF HIS POSITIONS. THEN HE SAID LET’S TAKE AWAY
IMMUNITY AND DO FEDERAL BACKGROUND CHECKS. TO BE FAIR TO HILLARY CLINTON,
AND I AGREE WITH BERNIE SANDERS A LOT MORE THAN HILLARY,
SHE HAS BEEN FIGHTING FOR GUN CONTROL FOR A LONG TIME. IT’S NOT JUST FOR POLITICAL GAIN
THAT SHE IS DOING THIS. IT WAS UNDER BILL CLINTON THAT
WE BANNED AUTOMATIC WEAPONS- ASSAULT WEAPONS ACTUALLY. SHE SAID WE STOPPED THEM IN THE
90S, AND WE BEAT THEM. WE’RE GOING TO FIGHT THEM AGAIN. SHE SAID SHE IS NOT GOING TO
BE AFRAID OF THE NRA. THAT IS A LOT OF STRONG TALK.
I LIKE THAT KIND OF STRONG TALK. WHEN HILLARY IS STRONG,
SHE IS SUPER STRONG. THAT IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE. I DON’T THINK THE PRIMARY
REASON FOR DOING THIS IS POLITICAL, I THINK SHE’S
GENUINELY PASSIONATE ABOUT IT. AT THE SAME TIME, THERE IS
THAT ADDED BENEFIT OF CALLING BERNIE SANDERS OUT
ON THIS ISSUE. AND HE SHOULD BE CALLED OUT.

100 thoughts on “Hillary Clinton’s Plan To Reduce Gun Violence

  1. What a dumb ass, a FMJ will go though a seat you don't need "SCARY ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNITION" to go through a chair

  2. Hey, you know that shootout in San Burnadino California, YEA guns are 100% illegal there… But did you hear about that shoot out at that gun range? ME ETHER!

  3. us americans gotta keep are guns just incase there's another civil war duh,,,,,, Guns are part of America's history and we plan on keeping them.

  4. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/16/hillary-clinton/clinton-gun-industry-wholly-protected-all-lawsuits/

  5. Haha haha SO powerful it went threw a seat!!? really you call that powerful!? just about any bullet and any caliper could go threw cushion and a plastic back! it doesn't need to be armor piercing!! Stupid fat young turd making himself sound stupid yet again!

  6. the young turds might want to brush up on the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.
    if you want to amend the CONSTITUTION,see ARTICLE 5 of that AUGUST document .

    you will need 38 states to ratify a change in the CONSTITUTION ,obama knows he can not get 3 states to agree with him so what does his sorry ass do.
    he tries to circumvent the law with executive orders.
    now clinton is running her liberal socialist mouth ,and she too ignoring the law ,YOU KNOW ,the CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS.
    OBAMA TOOK AN OATH OF OFFICE ,he is in violation of that oath(not that his word means anything he will lie at the drop of a hat) congress needs to impeach this president ,for his failure to uphold his oath OF OFFICE.

    “I, <name>, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

    RUN DON RUN

  7. I don't think people realize that 72 hour window is because of the government. Once that 3 days hits, they can do whatever they want with it. Also the whole deal about holding manufactures accountable is stupid. I get in a car accident…. is it all of a sudden Honda's fault? NO! All you liberals do is base everything off of emotion, feelings, and knee jerk reactions and completely ignore logic and facts.

  8. 00:20: What Ms. Kasparian says is completely false. Gun manufacturers have never been immune from or protected from lawsuits stemming from negligently manufactured products.
    She is either intentionally spreading lies or she is just stupid.
    03:30: What Mr. Uygur is saying is completely false. Vaccine manufacturers, auto manufacturers, aircraft manufacturers, all have laws to protect them from frivolous lawsuits stemming from misuse of their product.
    These guys are lairs.

  9. Young Turks, first I want to express my respect for what you guys do. Regarding this video I would like to point out that multiple incorrect statements were made. I myself am a firearm owner, and I get upset when I read, or in your case watch a video, that spreads so much incorrect information. First, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act does not give immunity to gun manufacturers. The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act does not protect a manufacturer from negligence or a defective product. It protects them from frivolous lawsuits that serve no purpose other than to hurt a company. Do you think Porsche should be held liable for Paul Walkers death? The Porsche was determined not defective in anyway. If your answer is "no, they shouldn't be liable" then why would you think differently for a manufacturer of a different product? Please do not join the anti-gun movement that tries to get followers by spreading incorrect information. I am a register democrat but I will not be voting for Hilary due to her spreading incorrect information to get followers.

  10. a lot of people get there guns from illegal sales James holms used a 5.56 AR 15 platform that is a semi auto rifle that means 1 shot per trigger pull not everyone can have fully automatic weapons if you haven't shot a gun you have no respect for it i shoot every day my family has a gun range we have a class 3 weapons perk meaning we can own a fully aoutmatic gun now a lot of crimlinals get cheap guns hi point fire arms if you fight guns your taking away the citizens guns and just arming criminals this is not what the founding fathers wanted if Hillary is elected I'm moving to Texas and i will revolt against the country I'm fighting for if you support guns your getting a big hug and a salut from this marine semper fi

  11. Are they intentionally misleading people, or do they just not know any better? The LCA is not "immunity", but rather protection from frivolous lawsuits. Lucky gunner did not sell James Holmes firearms, but only ammunition, legally, for which there is no background check. Retailers do not conduct background checks, the FBI does. Dylan roof did not have a criminal record, nor was he under indictment, he had an arrest. You people really should not be misleading your viewers so egregiously.

  12. I have a rifle made it the 60s that is semi automatic, just because it looks like a rifle the military uses, don't make it the same.

  13. As long as guns are illegal, manufacturers shouldn't be sued unless the gun malfunctions. This is the dumbest and shadiest way to limit use of a legal item.. SMFH…

  14. I'm assuming because your channel is so biased that you didn't mention that she wants regulation like Australia. Which is extremely unconstitutional. If she gets elected she will strip us of our rights. Only an idiot would vote Hillary. I find the asinine rhetoric on this channel very amusing. Why should they be responsible for what people do with their products.

  15. opening up gun or ammo manufacturing to lawsuit would only be a benefit to the very rich and powerful lawsuit industry (formally known as lawyers).

  16. Exactly what our country needs…more young "State" sponsored and mind controlled inteligensia working for the Military Industrial Complex journalists. The only thing missing is their light green army uniforms and green caps with red stars on them, calling each other "comrades".

  17. I'm really really worried …because once all of our constitutional rights are taken away from big government, I believe the unemployment rate will skyrocket due to all the state funded journalists and news correspondents who will be out of work once their job is done being the mouthpiece for big brother… These liberal fascists need to have an enemy like the conservatives because how else can they even remotely justify their useless cause. Truth be told if they had their perfect "Utopia" it wouldn't last very long, because ultimately they would have to oppress someone. It's the nature of man to destroy himself.

  18. Hey Cenk, ever heard of the PLCAA? It is a FEDERAL law, I guess Hilliary is not going to want people to abide by that law? Dolts.

  19. it doesnt take armor piercing ammo to punch through a plastic backed foam filled seat, cheap target ammo could do that, ap ammo is designed to punch through metal/cover, nor can you blame a ammo manufacturer for what an idiot did with said ammo, would you sue kia if some ass in an optima killed a family of 5 in a head on.

  20. im for background checks but seriously too sue an ammo manufacturer because bullets kill its stupid would you sue the cable company because your cable and internet worked just as its supposed to that laws in place to prevent idiots with the Mcdonalds made me fat logic for being just that idiots

  21. Gun manufacturers don't have complete immunity if gun manufacturers sell a gun knowing that is defective and hurts someone then they can be sued, also if they knowing sell to to a criminals, and have have a breach of contract then they can be also sued. The only reason that the protection of lawful commerce in arms act was created was to stop frivolous lawsuits. If someone stabs and kills someone with a knife or kills someone with a baseball bat you don't sue the manufacturer you hold that person and there actions accountable. So there gun manufacturers are not immunity only against someone using there product illegally or in a criminal fashion. For a so called news organization The Young Turks should do more research along with Hillary Clinton before jumping on something

  22. There should be a law that people that are uninformed and uneducated about guns,are banned from talking about them. Dumb-asses!!! 🙂

  23. He says that the armor penetrating rounds were able to go through the theater seat… What were the seats made of inch thick titanium? Any bullet will do that. Although im completely on board with making the gun industry pay, while were at it lets make gm pay for people who commit vehicular homicide, the fertilizer industry for bombings and the pharmaceutical companies for date rape!

  24. Hillary Clinton needs to concentrate on improving her blowjob skills, so Bill Clinton will not be getting it from somebody else.

  25. People who know nothing about an issue should have enough control to separate themselves from it. What is an "assault weapon"? Did banning them have any positive effect on crime, or did it only strip away something that was once a right of law abiding people? Why must we constantly look for a way to legislate our way out of evil while simultaneously taking away the right to defend against it?

  26. TYT, you are wrong, the vaccine companys ALSO have immunity. Do your research before repeating clinton taking points.

  27. In that case
    I want to be able to make the people responsible that support "gun free zones" for any family member or friend that could be killed in "gun free zone"

  28. What Loopholes???? Every gun I have ever bought I have had a Background check, whether it be online or at a gun show! So Thanks for showing your ignorance, and throwing out those catch fraise you Liberals love you use, but they simple are crap and shows just how poorly educated to are on the mater. I challenge you to go to a Gun Show and see if you can buy a guy without a back ground check. Surely you could get away with it on line! I'll even help you out heres an online way to buy guns. http://www.gunbroker.com/

  29. Do you think that the logical fallacy of gun control will actually work. Cenk you urine colored moron. Shut up please your embarrassing yourself.

  30. Liberal & Hillary don't seem to care about gun violence when Americans are killed over seas by Muslim Extremist… Just look at her own words.. "WHAT'S DOES IT MATTER!!"

  31. worthless liberal skewed garbage. if I jump in a car and mowed down a bunch of people they can't do General Motors you cannot hold a company liable for a third party criminal offense.

  32. just about any gun has the power to shoot through a movie theatre seat, it doesn't have to be (armor piercing) to shoot through a chair and splatter anyone's brain.

  33. According to FBI crime statistics if we eliminated our minority populations, or even just our black population America would have one of the lowest crime rates in the world.

  34. So when some asshole driver causes a car accident and kills somebody, their family can sue the car manufacturer? What somebody gets beat to death with a tax book, can their family sue the government?

  35. So if someone mows down a bunch of people with their car the surviving families can sue the auto manufacture? That is how silly this idea is.

  36. So if I wreck my Nissan into a crowd of people should Nissan be held accountable for my actions??? Does my Car kill people by definition??? Come on Young Turds!!! Hillary killed the US Ambassador in 2012 Benghazi she is a murdering Libtard and a freeking liar. HILLARY For Prision 2016!!!!

  37. Reason this won't work: Killers sure as hell don't care about an extra illegal weapon charge when they just committed murder.

  38. And the removing gun Company's legal immunity means that if someone buys a gun from them and then missuses it the company is in trouble, which is obviously not fair(Unless the company illegally sold it to them then it would be fair). If something goes wrong with a gun and causes harm they are already liable now.

  39. This guy doesn't know much about guns, any gun is going to penetrate a movie theater seat. If it wasn't even powerful enough to do that it probably wouldn't even penetrate your skin.

  40. I don't believe you make a distinction between the manufacturer and the gun seller. Why if you produce a gun, should you be penalized if a gun seller doesn't do a background check?? They simply manufactured the gun. How can you justify a law suit against them?

  41. Over 60% of gun deaths in the U.S. are from suicides. There are also Alot of people shot illegally owned guns and police officers!!! If you fuckheads ban assault rifles it wont do shit. Cops will still have guns, criminals is Always have guns, and people will find other ways to kill them self.

  42. Look at the like to dislike ratio. why don't these ultra liberal pussies just drop it. if that bullshit goes through, where will it end? ppl sue Hennessy cause some drunk driver killed a family while intoxicated on their liquor? how about hammers, knives, padlocks?

  43. Wow,what a complete bunch of bullshit. Number 1 if a gun manufacturer produces a firearm that's defective and harms someone they are liable under the law. If I shoot someone then they're not just like ever other company isn't reliable for how people use their products. You guys are just government propagandists. If you're not then you're just morons. Maybe Hillary will illegally do away with freedom of the press and put your assets in jail also,since you're for the president violating the bill of rights.

  44. Hillary's a true Criminal. she should be in jail with all of the minimum mandatory drug offenders that are doing time for possession. she's done far worse things then having possession of drugs

  45. and I know this really is not about Hillary. but she has no business making policy she should be in jail

  46. The NOT at all what we want for a President of the United States- Hillary Clinton & Bernie Sanders- they both want to take away our great 2ND AMENDMENT, and if either of the two were to succeed in such a worse than communist move, it would make We the People of the United States- powerless, defenseless, helpless, hopeless, repressed, controlled, and even where we would be slaughtered if we so much as dared to open our mouth in opposition (all we could then do, but hopeless/useless) to what would then be worse than a dictatorship. This would be ridiculous, and these liberals like what would be worse directed and headed for- than even communist ways! Like a one world government.

  47. A friend of mine was killed by a drunk driver.
    I don't blame Toyota for making the car.
    I don't blame the dealer for selling the car.
    I don't blame the company that made what ever it was he was drinking.
    I blame the driver!!!

  48. This is where I completely disagree with the @TYT . unfortunately your panel doesn't takes consideration for what this subject entails… the right to bear arms and the other issues that highlight gun attacks. why punish the 300,000,00 for what the 10 do. understand the nature of government vs civilian relationship and see what common people have vs tyranny. it would have been nice to see some real substance about our affairs, but it looks like it's a difficult proposition to ask you to see anything other than "guns are bad, we need to take them away."

  49. The young and brain-dead turkeys you guys are, it's a shame really because I've actually heard you guys make some very interesting and valid points. When it comes to the issue of guns, please stick to what you know please and do not demonize the AR-15, believe me if you have any gun that can't penetrate a movie seat, you don't have a real gun. Also, you guys don't understand why the founding fathers put the second amendment into place and if you are not careful, history could easily repeat itself( Stalin's Russia, Chairman Mao's China, Hitler's Germany, Lenin's Russia, Castro's Cuba and many more) and if you think I'm being a "paranoid conspiracy theorist" all you need to do is look into it for yourselves. Here's a hint, look into the writings of Saul Alinsky, famous socialist with an eight step program for the total control of a people. The first step is a universal healthcare plan " if you control a population's medical care, you control that population". The eighth and final step in this madman's plan is to heavily disarm the population. I'm not going over all of this because you obviously know how to read so please, look into this! BTW, Obama also wrote about and praised this man's writings and ideas at the university of Chicago. When Bill Clinton was elected, officials at the Whitehouse did everything they could to bury Hilary's thesis, it ended up leaking a couple of years later. Take a serious look at this, if you still think I'm paranoid, fine but you won't😋!

  50. The young and brain-dead turkeys you guys are, it's a shame really because I've actually heard you guys make some very interesting and valid points. When it comes to the issue of guns, please stick to what you know please and do not demonize the AR-15, believe me if you have any gun that can't penetrate a movie seat, you don't have a real gun. Also, you guys don't understand why the founding fathers put the second amendment into place and if you are not careful, history could easily repeat itself( Stalin's Russia, Chairman Mao's China, Hitler's Germany, Lenin's Russia, Castro's Cuba and many more) and if you think I'm being a "paranoid conspiracy theorist" all you need to do is look into it for yourselves. Here's a hint, look into the writings of Saul Alinsky, famous socialist with an eight step program for the total control of a people. The first step is a universal healthcare plan " if you control a population's medical care, you control that population". The eighth and final step in this madman's plan is to heavily disarm the population. I'm not going over all of this because you obviously know how to read so please, look into this! BTW, Obama also wrote about and praised this man's writings and ideas at the university of Chicago. When Bill Clinton was elected, officials at the Whitehouse did everything they could to bury Hilary's thesis, it ended up leaking a couple of years later. Take a serious look at this, if you still think I'm paranoid, fine but you won't😋!

  51. listening to liberals talk about guns is like listening to Forrest Gump give a lecture on neuroscience.

  52. I'm a 54 year old life long Democrat that votes for Obama twice. I can't stand republican politicians! But the only thing I agree with them on is gun control… As we don't need anymore of it. Gun manufacturers should not be sued unless they neglect a safety issue that results in injury. She also wants to ban AR15's. I can't stand Trump or Hillary and I won't be voting for the first stone since 1980. And I voted for Jimmy Carter. I will not vote for Clinton! Let the chips fall where they may

  53. Only the gun makers are safe? Really? When was the last time knife, hammer, bat, alcohol, or even car makers were sued when someone misused their product and killed someone? This channel gets more and more ridiculous.

  54. Another TYT video filled with false information and bad spin jobs. The reason there is a time limit on background checks is b/c it forces the government agencies, who actually due the background checks, to do their job in a timely manner. Also almost all companies and businesses are protected by lawsuits UNLESS a death or injury is actually caused by their product malfunctioning. Gun manufacturers are no different in that aspect. People can't sue car companies when people die in crashes and families can't sue pool companies because their child drowned. People who wish to give up their firearms or have more laws imposed must be ignorant of history or have lived a very secure life and know little of the evil in the world.

  55. Recently moved out of my parents house. 8 of my guns are in my room and I have various others hidden. Had a hand gun since I was in 5th grade and always been raised around them. Why the hell haven't my guns killed anyone or shot up a school? It couldn't be the handler could it? But that's impossible! People kill people let's ban people from the United States! Argue with that point liberals.

  56. So you take guns from law abiding citizens, thanks you just made robbery easier for outlaws! Hilary is supposed to be indicted but she wont why? Cause she got the white house by the balls and she will spill the tea if she does get indicted

  57. The reason why I stopped watching TYT as much as I use to is the blatant misinformation they are putting out. Doing it knowing most of what they are saying is incorrect. This video is damn near 100% false information. Typical Liberal  Arguments based off emotion rather than actual facts and logic.

  58. I think gun companies weren't told of their immunity from lawsuits because they pay a lot of lawyers , and it would be nice if someone told them

  59. Cenk doesn't think bullets should be able to go through cushioned chairs. Gosh, how did I miss this gold mine of idiocy back in 2015?

  60. The family that sued the store that sold the Aurora shooter a firearm knew that their chances of winning against the store were slim to none and they should have known that they could be held responsible for the defendant's lawyer bills so no crocodile tears are appropriate. DOn't forget that her support for gun bans contributed to her loss in the 2016 electioon

  61. Ummm… Ok, I could understand suing the gun store owner. But why should they be able to sue the manufacturer unless the weapon malfunctioned? Can someone explain that to me?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *