Articles, Blog

handgun ban advertising


DAVIS GRANTED ZERO. THIS IS A POSITIVE STEP AGAINST MASS INCARCERATION. CALIFORNIA GUN SAILORS — SELLERS HAVE BEEN VICTORIOUS IN COURT. AND SACRAMENTO JUDGE BAND A LAW FROM OVER 100 YEARS AGO USING COMMERCIALS TO ADVERTISE. GUN SHOP OWNERS ARE CALLING IT A VICTORY. THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO ADVERTISE HOW THEY WANT TO AND NOW THEY HAVE THE OPTION TO DO SO. YOU HAVE SEEN GUN SHOP SIGNS AND DISPLAYS, WHAT YOU GENERALLY WILL NOT SEE IS A IMAGE OF A HANDGUN ON THE STOREFRONT. A CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Reporter: ROB ADAMS OWNS THE SACRAMENTO BLACK RIFLE SHOP. THE STORES LOGO HAS A PISTOL EMBEDDED IN THE OUR. — THE R. NO STORE CAN USE A HANDGUN FOR ADVERTISING PURPOSES. PREVIOUS TO THE DAY, WE WERE NOT ALLOWED TO USE LITERATURE PICTURES OR ANYTHING OUTSIDE WITHIN THE PUBLIC’S VIEW. Reporter: THE OWNER OF A BUSINESS FILED SUIT AFTER THEY FOUND OUT THEY WERE BREAKING THE LAW. IT IS A ARCHAIC LAW THAT NOBODY KNEW WAS ON THE BOOKS. Reporter: 1923, THE LAW PASSED TO PREVENT THE IMPULSE PURCHASE OF A HANDGUN IN HOPES OF PROTECTING AGAINST VIOLENCE AND SUICIDE. THE COURT FOUND THERE IS ALREADY PROVISIONS IN PLACE LIKE A 10 DAY WEIGHT AND SERIOUS BACKGROUND CHECKS. THERE IS A LOT OF LAYERS BEFORE YOU GET TO TAKE HOME YOUR FIREARM. Reporter: AND A 15 PAGE DOCUMENT BETWEEN THE GUN SHOP OWNERS VERSUS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, A FEDERAL JUDGE FOUND THE LAW WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATING CALIFORNIA MAY NOT ACCOMPLISH ITS GOALS BY VIOLATING THE FIRST AMENDMENT. THE STATE HAS 30 DAYS TO APPEAL IT WHICH I AM SURE THEY WILL. THEY WILL LOSE AGAIN. Reporter: ADAM SAYS IT IS A GUN BATTLE THEY HAVE BEEN VICTORIOUS FOR NOW AND IT IS RIGHT ON TARGET. WE WILL ADVERTISE LIKE CRAZY NOW. Reporter: LITIGATION TOOK FOUR YEARS TO COME TO THIS DECISION. AS FAR AS THE GENERAL’S OFFICE, THEY ARE REVIEWING THE DECISION

3 thoughts on “handgun ban advertising

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *