Articles, Blog

Gov. Gavin Newsom signs 15 laws on gun control


GUN GUN CONTROL GUN CONTROL TOOK GUN CONTROL TOOK CENTER GUN CONTROL TOOK CENTER STAGE. GUN CONTROL TOOK CENTER STAGE.
WIDGET GUN CONTROL TOOK CENTER STAGE.
WIDGET CALIFORNIA GUN CONTROL TOOK CENTER STAGE.
WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS GUN CONTROL TOOK CENTER STAGE.
WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS MULTIPLE GUN CONTROL TOOK CENTER STAGE.
WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS MULTIPLE
NEW GUN CONTROL TOOK CENTER STAGE.
WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS MULTIPLE
NEW GUN GUN CONTROL TOOK CENTER STAGE.
WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS MULTIPLE
NEW GUN LAWS GUN CONTROL TOOK CENTER STAGE.
WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS MULTIPLE
NEW GUN LAWS AFTER GUN CONTROL TOOK CENTER STAGE.
WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS MULTIPLE
NEW GUN LAWS AFTER GOVERNOR WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS MULTIPLE
NEW GUN LAWS AFTER GOVERNOR WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS MULTIPLE
NEW GUN LAWS AFTER GOVERNOR
NEWSOM WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS MULTIPLE
NEW GUN LAWS AFTER GOVERNOR
NEWSOM SIGNED WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS MULTIPLE
NEW GUN LAWS AFTER GOVERNOR
NEWSOM SIGNED A WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS MULTIPLE
NEW GUN LAWS AFTER GOVERNOR
NEWSOM SIGNED A PACKAGE WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS MULTIPLE
NEW GUN LAWS AFTER GOVERNOR
NEWSOM SIGNED A PACKAGE OF WIDGET CALIFORNIA HAS MULTIPLE
NEW GUN LAWS AFTER GOVERNOR
NEWSOM SIGNED A PACKAGE OF 15 NEW GUN LAWS AFTER GOVERNOR
NEWSOM SIGNED A PACKAGE OF 15 NEW GUN LAWS AFTER GOVERNOR
NEWSOM SIGNED A PACKAGE OF 15
NEW NEW GUN LAWS AFTER GOVERNOR
NEWSOM SIGNED A PACKAGE OF 15
NEW BILLS. NEWSOM SIGNED A PACKAGE OF 15
NEW BILLS. NEWSOM SIGNED A PACKAGE OF 15
NEW BILLS.
NEWSOM NEWSOM SIGNED A PACKAGE OF 15
NEW BILLS.
NEWSOM RAN NEWSOM SIGNED A PACKAGE OF 15
NEW BILLS.
NEWSOM RAN ON NEWSOM SIGNED A PACKAGE OF 15
NEW BILLS.
NEWSOM RAN ON A NEWSOM SIGNED A PACKAGE OF 15
NEW BILLS.
NEWSOM RAN ON A CAMPAIGN NEWSOM SIGNED A PACKAGE OF 15
NEW BILLS.
NEWSOM RAN ON A CAMPAIGN THAT NEW BILLS.
NEWSOM RAN ON A CAMPAIGN THAT NEW BILLS.
NEWSOM RAN ON A CAMPAIGN THAT
PROMISED NEW BILLS.
NEWSOM RAN ON A CAMPAIGN THAT
PROMISED THE NEW BILLS.
NEWSOM RAN ON A CAMPAIGN THAT
PROMISED THE STRICT NEW BILLS.
NEWSOM RAN ON A CAMPAIGN THAT
PROMISED THE STRICT LIMITS NEW BILLS.
NEWSOM RAN ON A CAMPAIGN THAT
PROMISED THE STRICT LIMITS ON NEWSOM RAN ON A CAMPAIGN THAT
PROMISED THE STRICT LIMITS ON NEWSOM RAN ON A CAMPAIGN THAT
PROMISED THE STRICT LIMITS ON
FIREARMS. PROMISED THE STRICT LIMITS ON
FIREARMS. PROMISED THE STRICT LIMITS ON
FIREARMS.
SO PROMISED THE STRICT LIMITS ON
FIREARMS.
SO WHAT PROMISED THE STRICT LIMITS ON
FIREARMS.
SO WHAT CHANGES PROMISED THE STRICT LIMITS ON
FIREARMS.
SO WHAT CHANGES WITH PROMISED THE STRICT LIMITS ON
FIREARMS.
SO WHAT CHANGES WITH THE PROMISED THE STRICT LIMITS ON
FIREARMS.
SO WHAT CHANGES WITH THE NEW FIREARMS.
SO WHAT CHANGES WITH THE NEW FIREARMS.
SO WHAT CHANGES WITH THE NEW
LAWS? SO WHAT CHANGES WITH THE NEW
LAWS? SO WHAT CHANGES WITH THE NEW
LAWS?
SENATE SO WHAT CHANGES WITH THE NEW
LAWS?
SENATE BILL SO WHAT CHANGES WITH THE NEW
LAWS?
SENATE BILL 61 SO WHAT CHANGES WITH THE NEW
LAWS?
SENATE BILL 61 VANCE SO WHAT CHANGES WITH THE NEW
LAWS?
SENATE BILL 61 VANCE CALIFORNIA LAWS?
SENATE BILL 61 VANCE CALIFORNIA LAWS?
SENATE BILL 61 VANCE CALIFORNIA
IS LAWS?
SENATE BILL 61 VANCE CALIFORNIA
IS UNDER LAWS?
SENATE BILL 61 VANCE CALIFORNIA
IS UNDER 21 LAWS?
SENATE BILL 61 VANCE CALIFORNIA
IS UNDER 21 YEARS LAWS?
SENATE BILL 61 VANCE CALIFORNIA
IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD LAWS?
SENATE BILL 61 VANCE CALIFORNIA
IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD FROM SENATE BILL 61 VANCE CALIFORNIA
IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD FROM SENATE BILL 61 VANCE CALIFORNIA
IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD FROM
BUYING SENATE BILL 61 VANCE CALIFORNIA
IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD FROM
BUYING SEMI SENATE BILL 61 VANCE CALIFORNIA
IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD FROM
BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC SENATE BILL 61 VANCE CALIFORNIA
IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD FROM
BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES. IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD FROM
BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES. IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD FROM
BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES.
IT IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD FROM
BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES.
IT MAKES IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD FROM
BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES.
IT MAKES IT IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD FROM
BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES.
IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD FROM
BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES.
IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR IS UNDER 21 YEARS OLD FROM
BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES.
IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR ANYONE BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES.
IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR ANYONE BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES.
IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR ANYONE
TO BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES.
IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR ANYONE
TO BUY BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES.
IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR ANYONE
TO BUY MORE BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES.
IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR ANYONE
TO BUY MORE THAN BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES.
IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR ANYONE
TO BUY MORE THAN ONE BUYING SEMI AUTOMATIC RIFLES.
IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR ANYONE
TO BUY MORE THAN ONE SEMI IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR ANYONE
TO BUY MORE THAN ONE SEMI IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR ANYONE
TO BUY MORE THAN ONE SEMI
AUTOMATIC IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR ANYONE
TO BUY MORE THAN ONE SEMI
AUTOMATIC RIFLE IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR ANYONE
TO BUY MORE THAN ONE SEMI
AUTOMATIC RIFLE PER IT MAKES IT ILLEGAL FOR ANYONE
TO BUY MORE THAN ONE SEMI
AUTOMATIC RIFLE PER MONTH. TO BUY MORE THAN ONE SEMI
AUTOMATIC RIFLE PER MONTH. TO BUY MORE THAN ONE SEMI
AUTOMATIC RIFLE PER MONTH.
A TO BUY MORE THAN ONE SEMI
AUTOMATIC RIFLE PER MONTH.
A DIFFERENT TO BUY MORE THAN ONE SEMI
AUTOMATIC RIFLE PER MONTH.
A DIFFERENT BUILD, TO BUY MORE THAN ONE SEMI
AUTOMATIC RIFLE PER MONTH.
A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY AUTOMATIC RIFLE PER MONTH.
A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY AUTOMATIC RIFLE PER MONTH.
A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY
BILL AUTOMATIC RIFLE PER MONTH.
A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY
BILL 61 AUTOMATIC RIFLE PER MONTH.
A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY
BILL 61 WILL AUTOMATIC RIFLE PER MONTH.
A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY
BILL 61 WILL MAKE AUTOMATIC RIFLE PER MONTH.
A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY
BILL 61 WILL MAKE CALIFORNIA A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY
BILL 61 WILL MAKE CALIFORNIA A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY
BILL 61 WILL MAKE CALIFORNIA
THE A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY
BILL 61 WILL MAKE CALIFORNIA
THE FIRST A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY
BILL 61 WILL MAKE CALIFORNIA
THE FIRST STATE A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY
BILL 61 WILL MAKE CALIFORNIA
THE FIRST STATE TO A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY
BILL 61 WILL MAKE CALIFORNIA
THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW A DIFFERENT BUILD, ASSEMBLY
BILL 61 WILL MAKE CALIFORNIA
THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW AN BILL 61 WILL MAKE CALIFORNIA
THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW AN BILL 61 WILL MAKE CALIFORNIA
THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW AN
EMPLOYER, BILL 61 WILL MAKE CALIFORNIA
THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW AN
EMPLOYER, COWORKERS BILL 61 WILL MAKE CALIFORNIA
THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW AN
EMPLOYER, COWORKERS AND THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW AN
EMPLOYER, COWORKERS AND THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW AN
EMPLOYER, COWORKERS AND
EMPLOYEE THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW AN
EMPLOYER, COWORKERS AND
EMPLOYEE OR THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW AN
EMPLOYER, COWORKERS AND
EMPLOYEE OR TEACHER THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW AN
EMPLOYER, COWORKERS AND
EMPLOYEE OR TEACHER TO THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW AN
EMPLOYER, COWORKERS AND
EMPLOYEE OR TEACHER TO GET THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW AN
EMPLOYER, COWORKERS AND
EMPLOYEE OR TEACHER TO GET A THE FIRST STATE TO ALLOW AN
EMPLOYER, COWORKERS AND
EMPLOYEE OR TEACHER TO GET A GUN EMPLOYER, COWORKERS AND
EMPLOYEE OR TEACHER TO GET A GUN EMPLOYER, COWORKERS AND
EMPLOYEE OR TEACHER TO GET A GUN
VIOLENCE EMPLOYER, COWORKERS AND
EMPLOYEE OR TEACHER TO GET A GUN
VIOLENCE RESTRAINING EMPLOYER, COWORKERS AND
EMPLOYEE OR TEACHER TO GET A GUN
VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER EMPLOYEE OR TEACHER TO GET A GUN
VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER EMPLOYEE OR TEACHER TO GET A GUN
VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST EMPLOYEE OR TEACHER TO GET A GUN
VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST SOMEONE. VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST SOMEONE. VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST SOMEONE.
THIS VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST SOMEONE.
THIS WAS VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST SOMEONE.
THIS WAS VETOED VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST SOMEONE.
THIS WAS VETOED TWICE VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST SOMEONE.
THIS WAS VETOED TWICE BY VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST SOMEONE.
THIS WAS VETOED TWICE BY JERRY AGAINST SOMEONE.
THIS WAS VETOED TWICE BY JERRY AGAINST SOMEONE.
THIS WAS VETOED TWICE BY JERRY
BROWN. THIS WAS VETOED TWICE BY JERRY
BROWN. THIS WAS VETOED TWICE BY JERRY
BROWN.
IT THIS WAS VETOED TWICE BY JERRY
BROWN.
IT GOES THIS WAS VETOED TWICE BY JERRY
BROWN.
IT GOES FURTHER THIS WAS VETOED TWICE BY JERRY
BROWN.
IT GOES FURTHER THAN THIS WAS VETOED TWICE BY JERRY
BROWN.
IT GOES FURTHER THAN THE BROWN.
IT GOES FURTHER THAN THE BROWN.
IT GOES FURTHER THAN THE
PREVIOUS BROWN.
IT GOES FURTHER THAN THE
PREVIOUS LAW BROWN.
IT GOES FURTHER THAN THE
PREVIOUS LAW WHICH BROWN.
IT GOES FURTHER THAN THE
PREVIOUS LAW WHICH ALLOWED BROWN.
IT GOES FURTHER THAN THE
PREVIOUS LAW WHICH ALLOWED ONLY IT GOES FURTHER THAN THE
PREVIOUS LAW WHICH ALLOWED ONLY IT GOES FURTHER THAN THE
PREVIOUS LAW WHICH ALLOWED ONLY
LAW IT GOES FURTHER THAN THE
PREVIOUS LAW WHICH ALLOWED ONLY
LAW ENFORCEMENT IT GOES FURTHER THAN THE
PREVIOUS LAW WHICH ALLOWED ONLY
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IT GOES FURTHER THAN THE
PREVIOUS LAW WHICH ALLOWED ONLY
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND PREVIOUS LAW WHICH ALLOWED ONLY
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND PREVIOUS LAW WHICH ALLOWED ONLY
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND
IMMEDIATE PREVIOUS LAW WHICH ALLOWED ONLY
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND
IMMEDIATE FAMILY PREVIOUS LAW WHICH ALLOWED ONLY
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND
IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS PREVIOUS LAW WHICH ALLOWED ONLY
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND
IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS TO PREVIOUS LAW WHICH ALLOWED ONLY
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND
IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS TO GET LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND
IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS TO GET LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND
IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS TO GET
A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND
IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS TO GET
A RESTRAINING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND
IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS TO GET
A RESTRAINING ORDER. IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS TO GET
A RESTRAINING ORDER. IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS TO GET
A RESTRAINING ORDER.
ON IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS TO GET
A RESTRAINING ORDER.
ON TOP IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS TO GET
A RESTRAINING ORDER.
ON TOP OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS TO GET
A RESTRAINING ORDER.
ON TOP OF THAT, IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS TO GET
A RESTRAINING ORDER.
ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS TO GET
A RESTRAINING ORDER.
ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY BILL A RESTRAINING ORDER.
ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY BILL A RESTRAINING ORDER.
ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY BILL
12 A RESTRAINING ORDER.
ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY BILL
12 EXTENT A RESTRAINING ORDER.
ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY BILL
12 EXTENT THE A RESTRAINING ORDER.
ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY BILL
12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM A RESTRAINING ORDER.
ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY BILL
12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT A RESTRAINING ORDER.
ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY BILL
12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT OF ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY BILL
12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT OF ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY BILL
12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT OF
THE ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY BILL
12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT OF
THE GUN ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY BILL
12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT OF
THE GUN VIOLENCE ON TOP OF THAT, ASSEMBLY BILL
12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT OF
THE GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING 12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT OF
THE GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING 12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT OF
THE GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING
ORDER 12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT OF
THE GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING
ORDER FROM 12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT OF
THE GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING
ORDER FROM ONE 12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT OF
THE GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING
ORDER FROM ONE YEAR 12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT OF
THE GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING
ORDER FROM ONE YEAR TO 12 EXTENT THE MAXIMUM LIMIT OF
THE GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING
ORDER FROM ONE YEAR TO FIVE THE GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING
ORDER FROM ONE YEAR TO FIVE THE GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING
ORDER FROM ONE YEAR TO FIVE
YEARS. ORDER FROM ONE YEAR TO FIVE
YEARS. ORDER FROM ONE YEAR TO FIVE
YEARS.
>>>ORDER FROM ONE YEAR TO FIVE
YEARS.
>>>ASSEMBLY ORDER FROM ONE YEAR TO FIVE
YEARS.
>>>ASSEMBLY BILL ORDER FROM ONE YEAR TO FIVE
YEARS.
>>>ASSEMBLY BILL 645 ORDER FROM ONE YEAR TO FIVE
YEARS.
>>>ASSEMBLY BILL 645 REQUIRES YEARS.
>>>ASSEMBLY BILL 645 REQUIRES YEARS.
>>>ASSEMBLY BILL 645 REQUIRES
PACKAGING YEARS.
>>>ASSEMBLY BILL 645 REQUIRES
PACKAGING FOR YEARS.
>>>ASSEMBLY BILL 645 REQUIRES
PACKAGING FOR FIREARMS YEARS.
>>>ASSEMBLY BILL 645 REQUIRES
PACKAGING FOR FIREARMS TO>>>ASSEMBLY BILL 645 REQUIRES
PACKAGING FOR FIREARMS TO>>>ASSEMBLY BILL 645 REQUIRES
PACKAGING FOR FIREARMS TO
CONTAIN>>>ASSEMBLY BILL 645 REQUIRES
PACKAGING FOR FIREARMS TO
CONTAIN A>>>ASSEMBLY BILL 645 REQUIRES
PACKAGING FOR FIREARMS TO
CONTAIN A WARNING>>>ASSEMBLY BILL 645 REQUIRES
PACKAGING FOR FIREARMS TO
CONTAIN A WARNING STATEMENT>>>ASSEMBLY BILL 645 REQUIRES
PACKAGING FOR FIREARMS TO
CONTAIN A WARNING STATEMENT ON PACKAGING FOR FIREARMS TO
CONTAIN A WARNING STATEMENT ON PACKAGING FOR FIREARMS TO
CONTAIN A WARNING STATEMENT ON
SUICIDE PACKAGING FOR FIREARMS TO
CONTAIN A WARNING STATEMENT ON
SUICIDE PREVENTION. CONTAIN A WARNING STATEMENT ON
SUICIDE PREVENTION. CONTAIN A WARNING STATEMENT ON
SUICIDE PREVENTION.
IN CONTAIN A WARNING STATEMENT ON
SUICIDE PREVENTION.
IN ASSEMBLY CONTAIN A WARNING STATEMENT ON
SUICIDE PREVENTION.
IN ASSEMBLY BILL CONTAIN A WARNING STATEMENT ON
SUICIDE PREVENTION.
IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 CONTAIN A WARNING STATEMENT ON
SUICIDE PREVENTION.
IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES SUICIDE PREVENTION.
IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES SUICIDE PREVENTION.
IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES
THAT SUICIDE PREVENTION.
IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES
THAT 520 SUICIDE PREVENTION.
IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES
THAT 520 24, SUICIDE PREVENTION.
IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES
THAT 520 24, ALL SUICIDE PREVENTION.
IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES
THAT 520 24, ALL GUN SUICIDE PREVENTION.
IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES
THAT 520 24, ALL GUN PRECURSOR IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES
THAT 520 24, ALL GUN PRECURSOR IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES
THAT 520 24, ALL GUN PRECURSOR
PARTS IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES
THAT 520 24, ALL GUN PRECURSOR
PARTS MT IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES
THAT 520 24, ALL GUN PRECURSOR
PARTS MT BE IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES
THAT 520 24, ALL GUN PRECURSOR
PARTS MT BE SOLD IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES
THAT 520 24, ALL GUN PRECURSOR
PARTS MT BE SOLD THROUGH IN ASSEMBLY BILL 879 REQUIRES
THAT 520 24, ALL GUN PRECURSOR
PARTS MT BE SOLD THROUGH A THAT 520 24, ALL GUN PRECURSOR
PARTS MT BE SOLD THROUGH A THAT 520 24, ALL GUN PRECURSOR
PARTS MT BE SOLD THROUGH A
LICENSED THAT 520 24, ALL GUN PRECURSOR
PARTS MT BE SOLD THROUGH A
LICENSED SELLER THAT 520 24, ALL GUN PRECURSOR
PARTS MT BE SOLD THROUGH A
LICENSED SELLER AND THAT 520 24, ALL GUN PRECURSOR
PARTS MT BE SOLD THROUGH A
LICENSED SELLER AND WILL PARTS MT BE SOLD THROUGH A
LICENSED SELLER AND WILL PARTS MT BE SOLD THROUGH A
LICENSED SELLER AND WILL
REQUIRE PARTS MT BE SOLD THROUGH A
LICENSED SELLER AND WILL
REQUIRE A PARTS MT BE SOLD THROUGH A
LICENSED SELLER AND WILL
REQUIRE A BACKGROUND PARTS MT BE SOLD THROUGH A
LICENSED SELLER AND WILL
REQUIRE A BACKGROUND CHECK. LICENSED SELLER AND WILL
REQUIRE A BACKGROUND CHECK.

37 thoughts on “Gov. Gavin Newsom signs 15 laws on gun control

  1. Newsom should be impeached for violating the constitution. Trump should be the California governor after his 2024 term to reverse all the evil Newsom is doing.

  2. "That is one step for mankind………."

    Now use ownership and the right to have permits, as a means of drug testing those who want to own, registered weapons… Those who do not. take them away…

    No more, should there be, guns in the hands of these criminals who 'are in the game'…… The game should be over, with all the technology we have today…. Get out there and use weapons as a means of creating a civilized society, without drugs and corruption…… Arrest those who fail the drug test, they 'want game' , make their rap sheets a mile long…. Get them out of the economy, force them underground and then, shut off all economic means of support to and for them… That would also get rid of these illegal immigrants… That is the world that is funneling money to get these people into America and what is paying them to stay here.. They are not working legitimate jobs, they are out there, committing crime……

    Gun laws are smart…… Drug testing…. is smarter… Go a step further, do chemical analysis on smart phones, every time someone gets in their car, require it to start their vehicles, require it every time they go to the store and buy something, etc… if they fail…. send a Cop to arrest them……… Shut down their finances or accounts…… There are ways of approaching these issues, other than some useless wall….. Gun control is one way…… there are other, smarter ways…..

  3. Newsom says goodbye to guns. But welcome criminals! The next ban should be those stupid gun-free zone stickers (aka "we are unarmed please do not shoot".)

  4. YOU HEAR THAT CRIMINALS?! California citizens are basically unarmed and completely vulnerable! Get this…they all think that police can be everywhere for everyone at the exact crucial seconds they need them! Hahahahaha…hilarious, right? Haha they also think you criminals are gonna obey their gun laws HAHAHAHA! That's the one that cracks me up the most 🤣 So there you go, criminals…Cali is a state of opportunities, a haven for the criminal minded.

  5. He swore upon oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic. Does he know what the word infringe means? If not, he us unfit for governing. If yes, then he knowingly campaigned, all the while, to not keep his sworn oath. It also makes him unfit to handle government affairs and is actual treason upon pain of death.

  6. Arrest Gavin for subverting Federal Laws and overturning constitutional Integrity. We better "Lawyer Up". We're gotta hang TOGETHER or WE HANG SEPARATELY.

  7. The suicide warning label is a good idea. But ironically gunnuts think trying to save an estimated 24,000 gun owners from blowing their brains out every year is an infringement of their rights.

  8. these new gun laws will not really affect existing gun owners at all. So why all the "sky is falling "comments below? Isn't it worth saving police and citizen lives? There is a certain balance needed and this seems fair and reasonable.

  9. State Rep Anthony “ONE GUN A MONTH” Portantino
    (25th Senate District – Pasadena, Glendale, San Gabriel Valley…) has

    authored the following:

    SB 61 Gun Rationing “ONE GUN A MONTH” (twice vetoed by Brown…signed by Newsom)

    SB376 Limits the number of personally-owned firearms an individual can sell without a license (signed by Newsom)

    SB1100 Bans sale of long guns to under 21. (signed by Brown)

    SB 172 Punishes Gun Owners for Safe Gun Storage (pending in legislature)

    I URGE THE "PEOPLE" OF THE 25TH DISTRICT VOTE THIS TREASONOUS TYRANT OUT; INCLUDING ALL THE ACTIVE REPS THAT HAVE TAKEN PART IN THIS ASSAULT ON OUR LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS! TAKE NOTE FELLOW CALIFORNIANS THAT THIS DEMOCRATIC TRIFECTA AT ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT IN THE STATE IS LEADING TO AN EMERGING TYRANNY THAT DOES NOT REPRESENT "ALL" CALIFORNIANS AND VIOLATES "OUR" CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERTIES AND RIGHTS. TIME TO STEP UP AND PARTICIPATE IN BRINGING THE STATE BACK IN LINE WITH THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. CONTACT THESE IRRESPONSIBLE REPS VIA PHONE, EMAIL, LETTER, AND SOCIAL MEDIA TO OPPOSE THEIR ACTIONS. NO EXCUSES NOT TO VOTE AND REPORT ANY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES THAT COMPROMISE A SOUND ELECTION.

    Anthony “ONE GUN A MONTH” Portantino CONTACT INFO:

    (626-577-9944)

    sd25.senate.ca.gov

    https://twitter.com/Portantino

    https://www.facebook.com/portantino

  10. AB 879 is not intended to prevent "ghost guns." Its intended to stockpile gun owners' data. How do they differentiate between someone trying to build "a ghost gun" versus someone who is replace a broken, worn out or upgrade part to an already legally purchased/owned firearm? Not to mention its just another way to tax citizens for exercising a constitutional right. So in the end, they are really just penalizing gun owners and becoming the next surveillance capital while collecting data on every civilian who wants to exercise their right as a means of intimidation.

    AB 61 is problematic, because it preys on workplace conflict. All it takes is for one employee/employer to have a minute disagreement and if Employee/Employer A knows Employee/Employer B owns a gun(s), Employee/Employer A can just run to the court and create a fake complaint as a form of retaliation.

  11. Own guns you're a criminal in this state…but if your rob or steal something most you get is 30 days and your out because the prisons are "supposedly" full. Ain't it great in the Socialist Republik of Californiastan.

  12. Own guns you're a criminal in this state…but if your rob or steal something most you get is 30 days and your out because the prisons are "supposedly" full. Ain't it great in the Socialist Republik of Californiastan.

  13. Those against our "NOT TO BE INFRINGED RIGHT" should show in good faith by having all of their security disarmed first. F'ing hypocrites. You're safe, screw us right. RECALL NEWSOME NOW

  14. Sign the petition to recall Gavin Newsom as governor of California at a location near you IN PERSON and help us to stop this man and undo the damage he and his predecessor have caused to our beautiful state.
    By the time these new unconstitutional laws are enacted, we will be well on our way with more than one million signatures in hand, to removing this communist from office and taking back California from blue to red. Join us before it’s too late. 🇺🇸

  15. These new laws will allow law enforcement to obtain a warrant based on an assessment by non-qualified person’s regarding your personal state of mental health and well being and force their way into your home to confiscate your firearms for any purpose the court has seen fit.
    This is what happens in a country before the government is overthrown and it’s people are disarmed to squash resistance against the communist ruling state.

  16. The second Amendment's actual original purpose was to prevent pieces of garbage like Newcum from signing obscene , tyrannical laws like this into action…..then again Commiefornia is not really part of the US anyways

  17. Jimmy Drake for California Governor local man, husband, brother, father, union steward, and constitutionalist. A small town man with small business at heart. I will continue to fight evil and fight for the people to bring back justice to the people. Please spread the word and share.

  18. I don’t understand why there has not yet been an uprising/rebellion in California to overthrow these monsters in their government. Citizens there have only a fraction of their Constitutional rights, live in a constant state of worry and fear. Wholly depressing and negative environment, are burdened with ridiculous taxes and regulations and have a crushing cost of living which essentially makes those below a certain income level slaves. I vowed long ago never to visit there ever again. Why would I, there’s nothing there worth seeing anyway. I feel really bad for the few relatives and friends I have there. Every time I speak with them you can hear in their voices that they know they will never have peace and contentment while they remain there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *