100 thoughts on “AK-47 Underwater at 27,450 frames per second (Part 2) – Smarter Every Day 97

  1. Can you please do a video on shooting the gun bullet into the water instead of doing the whole thing under water?

  2. I will be on your channel as long as you are… Great stuff keep up the good work.
    (Captured a few of those AKs in 1968. 7th Marines Quang Nam Province)

  3. Yikes! I hope you don't damage what looks to be a nice Arsenal by firing with fluid filled barrel and gas system.

  4. Wait what would happen if you shot 3 rounds would they follow one another, like you shoot 1 and it creates a path in the water the 2 follows behind and third going even further???

  5. Very, very interesting. You helped me a lot in my researches for a schoolwork about supercavitation. Thanks !!

  6. Interested to know if the bullet created super cavitation rather than cavitation, because of its speed. If someone has an idea ?

  7. @ 7:17 the fav shot I see a phallic formation ejecting something 😂 and yeah I used the word because being disrespectful to Destin is not my intention.. But yeah my inner immature child showed at that moment 😂 can't unsee now. At 8:16 it can be seen better.

  8. i love TheSlowMoGuys, it was actually one of their videos that i found out about SmarterEveryDay because it was in the suggested videos section

  9. Destin, I need a video that shows the effect of tumbling bullets. The M16 bullet starts tumbling when it hits an object. Any chance that you can video the process?

  10. The cavitation effect is taken into serious consideration when designing pumps for various purpose. The inlet of the pump lowers the pressure, and so if you're pumping very hot water from a boiler, for instance, you have to make sure you aren't lowering the pressure below the vapor point for the water, otherwise you get steam pockets (Cavitation) in your pump and… Bad things happen.

  11. What you are seeing is the collapse of a supercavity, which when do so, sends a shockwave outwards, triggering cavitating in smaller pockets in the far field. Impressive camera! We use the Phantoms too, not this resolution though ;(, but better sensor efficiency than some of the other stuff our lab has lying around.

  12. I just tought that the bullet create vacum chamber after the powder blast,, thats why its expand and then back in together… but i was wrong … lol..

  13. Now, what would happen with a full automatic? What happens if you fire through the cavitation? Would the cavitation envelop a stationary object or reflect off it?

  14. When the bullet leaves the barrel and there is a small cut between the shock wave that the bullet creates underwater, I'm guessing that is when it goes from supersonic to subsonic? Am I right?

  15. so whdo love to know if you do have lemanes you shod try this again at night alls ow the shok way look kind of like a lighting storm and thunder and i got ask what did you fell when you fidr it how did the shok way or any of that feell

  16. i would add to your good insight another phenomenon here and propose an explanation. Perhaps both my observation and explanation are incorrect. However, it seems that the glass bubble collapses before the fuzzy bubble (perhaps in spite that the latter had more time for expansion and collapse). The glass bubble should be mostly vacuum – caused by the bullet edges breaking through the surface tension and pushing the liquid water out and forming a void. By thermodynamics, indeed there should be vapor inside, but I posit that there is insufficient time to come to vapor-liquid equilibrium. The fuzzy bubble, on the other hand, was created by water vapor from in front of the bullet, not behind it, and it is more in tune with vapor liquid equilibria. Therefore, the glass bubble has less vapor and thus less internal pressure than the fuzzy bubble. The external pressure (liquid) is roughly the same on both bubbles, and assuming that the both bubbles are roughly similar in area, the overall collapsing force is higher on the glass bubble and it will collapse before the fuzzy bubble, which it does.

  17. Has anybody seen the episode of Mythbusters when they a shot the 50 caliber in the pool and
    the bullet didn't go no more than 5 feet in the water

  18. Really cool video with great explanations thank you! Great job! Would love to see this same test done in the dark or very low light conditions. Might help solve the question of flash?

  19. If you were to tape off the end of the barrel and chamber a round first before submerging the AK then their would not be any water in the barrel for the built to push out so the bullet would me traveling faster and would go a bit father and make a bigger blast cloud at the end of the barrel.  A fun video Thanks

  20. How far does the bullet travel? Looks like after just some 50cm, the bullet would be so slow it can't puncture paper.

  21. I'm sorry but I couldn't comprehend all this with my inferior brain I was just here coz of the slo mo guys.

  22. At the point of implosion when there is a flash of light (and Destin considers sonar luminescence), notice that the image of the muzzle (and the rest of the frame for that matter) jostles back and forth. I would guess that about the same time it takes for the first bubble implosion is when the most energetic wave reaches the mirror box. It would be no coincidence that the bubble oscillation would then be in phase with the waves reaching the mirror. So Destin is likely correct that it is not sonar luminescence and likely a "reflection of the sunlight", but more specifically the change in apparent brightness is due to variation in angle of combined refraction/reflection through the mirror box. If the camera were moved or the box manually vibrated, one might also see a change in the apparent brightness of the overall image. The effect is just more pronounced when it occurs in sync with the bubbles.

  23. Also, remember that pressure is very much directional. It is simply an average force over an area… and the force in a liquid or gas can be directed so that more of the average motion of the particles are in a certain direction and hence the average force exerted is also higher in that direction. In static equilibrium, pressure is essentially equal in all directions over a small surface area at the same depth. But while flowing the pressure is generally only lower at the boundaries orthogonal to the flow. The pressure is actually higher along and in the direction of the flow than against the boundaries of the flow (i.e. tube walls). If the pressure were also lower in the direction of the flow, it would be lower than the water outside the barrel and so it would not escape the barrel, rather it would be pushed back further inside the barrel by the higher-pressure water outside! But that's not what happens. I mention this because like so many other subtle–but often repeated–incomplete ideas in science can spread misconception later on.

  24. between 2:02 and 2:16 Wooahhh did you see the shockwave rippling toward the camera; and how the rifle wobbles up and down like a piece of rubber?
    Wowww it's so cool how around 4:45–4:50 the air which was initially pushed radially from the the bullet then is pulled into the channel created by the bullet through the water.
    Thanks for explaining the Rayliegh-Plesset equation.

  25. Hey Destin, I have a quick question for you. Well maybe two, the first is, is there a way to message you on YouTube without messaging in a random video? And the second, and real question, is do the sounds that come from your throat sound different than the sounds that come out of your mouth? I was listening to an audiobook, and it mentioned a sticker that goes inside of your mouth that acts as a communication device. It's a fictional book and it's like a future technology that's been made up and I was curious if the sound that came from your throat into your mouth would sound the same as the sounds that come out of your mouth when you talk. I didn't know if the sounds were generated by your vocal cords and your lips and jaw inside of your mouth the same as they sound when they come out.

  26. Fantastic video as always. The bullet exiting the muzzle resembles a bullet impact into ballistic gelatin. My question is, what is in the temporary cavity? I understand that the water is pushed apart as in the ballistic gel, but where does the (what looks like) air come from? Soon after the temporary cavity is created, it collapses/implodes in on itself, but no air rises to the surface. What is in the temporary cavity? Thanks

  27. does about the same thing happen if you shoot 2 feet above water into water? does the water slow it down so that it only travels about 4 feet in the water?

  28. I'd quite like to see those beautiful collapsing bubbles happen through a column of dyes or inks in the water.. Destin. get the wet suit!

  29. it would be interesting to see this repeated in a pitch black environment to determine whether it is truly sonoluminescence, or just reflected light like you hypothesized.
    that has been an ongoing debate on so many ballistics gel videos I've watched.

  30. In your footage and the slowmo guys, I noticed something. The snub nose revolver projectile seem to travel straighter and didn't tumble as much. Is this possibly due to the shorter barrel not housing as much water volume, in turn lowering the hydraulic affect? Which would allow the bullet to gather more spin and less pressure to have to push thru?

  31. Would you consider firing more than one shot in as automatic fire in this context?
    I'm thinking about the effect of the compound shock waves, but also if the second round is traveling in the cavity left by the first, the round may travel further and more elegantly.

  32. Following the recent shootings in the US don’t you feel you should stop glorifying guns of any kind as a nation you can’t cope wither the responsibility

  33. This is why I love YouTube. Great video man. You won me over with this video and now just made me a subscriber.

  34. Is it possible to fire a gun fast enough to get bullets to travel through the cavitation bubble of the previous bullet and would this then make the bullet travel further?

    I know this is 6 years old but I think you should do it again but mount the gun and go full auto

  35. still my favorite myth busters show where they fired various guns into water. Amazing how NOT far the bullets went. Unlike all the old hollywood movies that showed bullets streaking down past the heroes. Even the 50 caliber disintegrated

  36. so much force on the front of the bullet. Not hard to now see why the bullet quickly turns off center instead of pointing straight ahead. Then once the bullet gets not pointed straight in the direction of the velocity vector, side forces are huge and the bullet can't go much further or disintegrates into pieces

  37. can you shoot a gun in an enclosed water filled container? would it just burst? and what would happen in the inside?
    Since Water cant be compressed, how would an explosion look like?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *